Dr. GoopENovGH wifhes to alter fome erroneous paflages in 
his paper, and to add the following note. 
Page 133, line 9, for them, read them/elves. 
Page 140, line 14, ftrike out the words /epius fub-diftichay 
which was an error in tranfcribing. 
In pages 137 and 169, Carex frrigofa fhould be defcribed /picis 
recurvis inftead of pendults. 
Page 155, line 7 from the bottom, read complete for accurate. 
Page 157, line 13, a femicolon fhould be pee after the 
word compofita. 
— 780, line rr, the Ayphen is an error of the prefs. 
ine ie. 13, auriculaté a an error of the pras for auriculg. 
There are others of lefs easi which it 1s needlefs to 
mention. 
manne 0. 09 ue 
Since my Obfervations have been printed, I have received from my 
friend Mr. Daval, fpecimens of the Carex defcribed by Scheuchzer 
P. 497, and figured t. rr. f. 9 and ro. quoted by Linnzus for 
C. dioica. It feems a diftinét fpecies, and will be the fubjeét of 
confideration when I come to treat of the foreign Carices. I have 
alfo received from my friend the Rev. Mr. Williams of Eaton 
near Shrewíbury, fpecimens of C. Airia, with fmooth vagine—I 
would therefore wifh the words vaginis binc lanato-villofis to be omit- 
ted in the fpecific defcription—and would beg leave to infert after . 
the long defcription—Plañta in aquofis variat vaginis glabris, 
