106 
95. L. circinale. The synonym of Don, Prodr. Fi. Nepal. 
belongs to L. caulescens, as we have ascertained by an exa- 
mination of Mr. Don's own specimens. 
After L. circinale, 
L. lepidophyllum. Hook. et Grev. 
Densissime czespitosum, caule bi-tripinnato ubique folioso, - 
foliis arctissime imbricatis coriaceo-rigidis obliquis late ovatis 
obtusis margine scariosis subtus pallidis rufescentibus, stipu- 
lis folio simillimis. 
Has. Near San Blas, Mexico. Capt. Henry Dundas, R.N. 
Peru. A. Caldcleugh, Esq.—Closely as this remarkable spe- 
cies resembles L. involvens in its appearance and mode of 
growtb, it is well distinguished by its broader and obtuse 
leaves and stipules, which are, moreover, furnished with a 
thin scariose border. The stems are about six inches in 
length, and, including the branches, somewhat more than an 
inch in breadth. Spikes 2-3 lines long, acutely quadrangular.. 
= 104, L. pennatum. We find, upon inspecting Mr. Don’s 
original specimens, that this species should be transferred to 
the group we have called Platystachya. 
108. L. anceps. Henke’s own specimen, named by Presl, 
in the Lambertian Herbarium, does not differ from £L. flabel- 
latum, L. 
133. After L. pumilio, 
L. radiatum. Aubl. Pl. de la Guiane, p. 96%. 
Has. Guiana. Aublet. 
143. L. stoloniferum. We find, upon examining authentic 
specimens of the L. stoloniferum of Swartz, in the Banksian 
Herbarium, communicated by himself from Hispaniola, that 
we have committed an error in regard to the present plant. 
The species we named L. Peppigianum is the true plant of 
Swartz, and was indeed transmitted to us as such by our 
friend Professor Kunze. Thespecific appellations of the two 
plants will, therefore, have to be transposed, and the syno- 
nyms of our L. stoloniferum referred to what we have errone- 
ously called L. Peppigianum. The stations belonging to the 
