153 
appears intermediate between C. heterophylla and C. 
glaucophylla : it is most allied to the former, differing 
from it by the broader and more obtuse foliage, and by 
the soft, almost woolly calyx. 
126. (4.) Cristaria heterophylla, Hook. et Arn.— Sida hetero- 
phylla, Cav.—Plains of Mendoza, Dr. Gillies; Mr. 
Cruckshanks.—g. pilis stellatis hispidis. C. hispida, Gill. 
mst.—Los Hornillas, Andes of Mendoza, Dr. Gillies.— 
The segments of the upper leaves are very shes The 
fruit is that of a Cristaria. 
127. (5.) Cristaria multifida, Cav.—Coquimbo, Cuming (N. 
1436.) 
128. (6.) Cristaria pinnatifida, Hook. et Arn. in. Bot of 
Beech. Voy. v. 1. p. 12.—Coquimbo, Messrs. Lay and 
Collie. | 
129. (7.) Cristaria dissecta, (Hook. et Arn.); annua, stellato- 
pubescens, foliis digitato-5-partitis segmentis cuneato- 
lanceolatis inciso-pinnatifidis foliorum superiorum an- 
gustissimis, panicula elongata multiflora, pedicellis elon- 
gatis, (floribus parvis), ala carpellis multo majore.— Val- 
paraiso, Mathews (N. 182.); Cuming (N. 41.) Cor- 
dillera of Chili, Cuming (N. 245.)—Sometimes the leaves 
are only 3-partite, but then the lateral Midi are 
again vipana ‘PE ad og fi 
130. (1.) Anoda haeti ms ESR b Mr.  Cruckshanhs. 
Buenos Ayres, and Chili, Dr. Gillies.—Perhaps Dr. 
Gillies’ specimens ought to be referred to A. triloba, but 
we cannot see any certain marks between them. 
131. (1.) Sida rhombifolia, Linn.—Buenos Ayres, Dr. Gillies. 
132. (2.) Sida hastata, St. Hil. Fl. Bras. Merid. v. 1. p. 190. 
t. 36. f. 2.—Pampas of ayes pie Ti iles. 
ne e Tweedie. == ai 
133. (3.) Sida Jussieana, DC. Sistani Rios, a Guia 
specimens have no fruit, but otherwise enon with 
De Candolle’s character of — 
134. (4.) Sida. nen DC.—J rilal (uncultivated places) 
