309 
Chili, Dr. Gillies.—g. Valparaiso, Bridges, 1832, (N. 
407, 
408. 
409, 
199.)—This may, we think, be distinguished from F. 
coccinea, which we have never seen from Chili, by the 
leaves, which are glabrous and crenate at the base, and 
by the elongated germens and fruit. F. conica, Lindl. 
Bot. Reg. t. 1062, is probably the same as our var. £. 
(1.) Epilobium alpinum, Linn.—E. pusillum, Gill. mst.— 
El Cerro de la Polcura and El Cerro de San Pedro 
Nolasco, Andes of Mendoza and Chili, Dr. Gillies.—Of 
. the present we have only seen the fruit and one flower- 
bud: in every point agreeing with our Scotch specimens. 
The fruit is certainly pedunculated and not sessile as 
Lehman describes it in Hook. Fl. Bor. Am. v. l. p. 
205. i 
(2.) Epilobium pedicellare, Presl, Relig. Henk. v. 2. 
p. 30. E. tetragonum, Linn.?—E. Arnottianum, Gill. mst. 
E. Andicolum, Gill. mst. —E. denticulatum, R. et P. ?— 
La Cienega de las Serrajas and El Valle de Uspallata, 
Endes of Mendoza; El Cerro de San Pedro Nolasco, 
Andes of Chili; Dr. Gillies. Valparaiso and Quillota, 
Bridges, 1832, (N. 179.)—What Dr. Gillies calls E 
Arnottianum is alone in a state for examination. The 
stigma and petals are as in Europzan specimens; 
the calycine segments lanceolate, acuminated, and 
marked with small pellucid lines. We cannot for a 
moment doubt that the Chilian specimens, at least, 
described by Ruiz and Pavon, belong to this species, 
although the plant be not at all suffruticose, as they 
describe it, but which is not so represented. 
(3.) Epilobium puberulum, ee: et Arn. ); puberulum, 
foliis inferioribus oppositis superioribus alternis lineari- 
lanceolatis acutis denticulatis obscure pellucido-lineolatis, 
laciniis calycinis lanceolatis, stigmate indiviso clavato.— 
Chiloe, Cuming (N. 36.)—1ts affinity is great with E. 
palustre, from some specimens of which it seems only 
to differ by the —— leaves. 
