570 ENUMERATION OF LEGUMINOSE. 
vegetior, tamen, ex speciminibus paucis a me visis, ab utra- 
que distincta videtur. 
. Burma territory, on the banks of the Irawaddy, and in 
Prome, Wallich ! 
70. C. nana (Burm. Fl. Ind. p. 156, t. 48. f. 2. W.et Arn.! 
= Prodr. 1, p. 191).—C. umbellata, Wight! in Wall. Cat. n. 
5383, W. et Arn.! Prodr. 1, p. 191. C. biflora, Herb. Madr.! 
in Wall Cat. n. 5381 non Linn. C. sobolifera var? Wall.! 
Cat. n. 4520 B. 
East India, common in the southern provinces, Wight! 
Ceylon, Walker! This plant does not appear to be noticed 
in the Flora Indica of Roxburgh, who perhaps included it 
with the C. linifolia in his C. cespitosa. 
Amongst the remaining published simple-leaved Crota- 
larie, C. Burmanni (DC. Prodr. 2, p. 126) taken up from the 
C. sericea (Burm. Fl. Ind. p. 156, t. 48, f. 1), isa very doubt- 
ful plant. De Candolle, who saw Burmann's specimen, 
doubts if it be distinct from C. tecta (which he had not 
seen), but Plukenet's synonym, quoted by Burmann, must 
belong to some plant allied to C. juncea, on account of the 
* siliqua ferruginea? Burmann’s figure does not look like 
any East Indian species known to me, but (making allowance 
for an evidently reduced scale) it is not unlike the American 
C. nitens. Wight and Arnott have overlooked it. 
C. leioloba (Bartl. Ind. Sem. Hort. Gott. 1837 ex Linnea 
12, Littbl. p. 80), is probably the C. ferruginea (supra p. 476), 
to the stations of which species must be added Assam, Grif- 
fiths ! n. 503. 
C. Nove Hollandie (DC. Prodr. 2, p. 127), from his cha- 
racter should perhaps be referred to the Foliolate series, with 
the leaves as in C. unifoliolata reduced to a single foliole, but 
the species is altogether doubtful. 
C. scandens (Lour. DC. Prodr. 2, p. 129) is most probably 
no Crotalaria at all. 
C. procumbens (DC. Prodr. 2, p. 129), taken up from a 
drawing of Mogino and Sessé’s is probably some species 
