i66 FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ZOOLOGY, VOL. XIII. 



*Eutoxeres aquila salvini (Gould). SALVIN'S SICKLE-BILL. 



Eutoxeres salvini GOULD, Ann. & Mag. N. H., I, 1868, p. 456 (Veragua, Panama); 

 SALVIN, Cat. Bds. Brit. Mus., XVI, 1892, p. 262; RIDGWAY, Bull. U. S. Nat. 

 Mus., V, 1911, p. 312; HELLMAYR, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1911, p. 1180; 

 CHAPMAN, Bull. Am. Mus. N. H., XXXVI, 1917, p. 284 (San Jose; San 

 Antonio, western Colombia). 



Range: Costa Rica to western Colombia. 

 3 : Panama i ; and Costa Rica 2. 



Eutoxeres aquila heterura Gould. GOULD'S SICKLE-BILL. 



E[utoxeres] heterura GOULD, Ann. & Mag. N. H., VI, 1868, p. 456, in text (Quito, 



Ecuador). 

 Eutoxeres heterura ELLIOT, Syn. Trochil., 1879, p. 3; HARTERT and HARTERT, 



Nov. Zool., I, 1894, P- 53- 

 Eutoxeres aquila heterura RIDGWAY, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, V, 1911, p. 311, 



in key; CHAPMAN, Bull. Am. Mus. N. H., XXXVI, 1917, p. 285 (Cocal, 



southwestern Colombia). 

 Eutoxeres baroni HARTERT and HARTERT, Nov. Zool., I, 1894, p. 54.* 



Range: Western Ecuador. 



Genus PAMPA REICHENBAGH. 



Pampa Reichenbach, Aufz. der Colib., 1854, p. n (Type P. campyloptera Reich. 

 = 0rnismya pampa Lesson). 



*Pampa pampa pampa (Lesson). WEDGE-TAILED SABRE- WING. 



Ornisnya pampa LESSON, Hist. Nat. Colibr., Suppl. Ois. Mouch., 1830-31, 



p. 127, pi. 15 ("Paraguay"; error = Guatemala). 

 Sphenoproctus pampa (not of Cabanis and Heine, 1860) SALVIN, Cat. Bds. Brit. 



Mus., XVI, 1892, p. 286. 



Pampa lessoni SIMON, Cat. Trochil., 1897, p. 8 (Guatemala). 

 Pampa pampa pampa RIDGWAY, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus. No. 50, V, 1911, p. 354. 



Range: Guatemala to Yucatan. 



2: Guatemala i; and "Central America" i. 



*Pampa pampa curvipennis (Licht.). CURVE- WINGED SABRE- WING. 

 Trochilus curvipennis LICHTENSTEIN, Preis-Verz. Mex. Vog., 1830, I, No. 32; 



Id., Journ. Ornith., 1863, p. 55 (Mexico). 

 Spenoproctus curvipennis SALVIN, Cat. Bds. Brit. Mus., XVI, 1892, p. 287, 



part. 



Eutoxeres baroni HARTERT & HARTERT: The preponderance of opinion seems to 

 be that this questionable species is not separable from E. a. heterura (cf. Salvadori & 

 Festa, Boll. Mus. Torino, XV, 1900, p. 2 and Hellmayr, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1911, 

 pp. 1180-1181, in text); Ridgway (Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus. No. 50, V, 1911, p. 312, in 

 key) and Oberholser (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XXIV, 1902, p. 314) recognizes it as a 

 distinct species. Chapman does not consider it as worthy of even subspecific value 

 (cf. Bull. Am. Mus. N. H., XXXVI, 1917, p. 285). 



