REFERENCES TO SCIENTIFIC TECHNIQUE 67 



This book is by an experienced medical editor and 

 contains many practical suggestions. 



RlCKARD, T. A. 



1910. A Guide to Technical Writing. Second Edition, pp. 



172. San Francisco. Mining and Scientific Press. 

 Intended primarily for writers on mining, and yet it 

 contains much that is useful and suggestive to zo- 

 ologists particularly the chapters on the need of sim- 

 plicity in the language of science, and on the value 

 of standardization. 



WARMAN, P. C. 



1903. A Plea for Better English in Science. Science, N. S., 

 Vol. XVIII, pp. 563-568. Reprinted with revision, 

 1910. Washington. 



DAVIS, W. M. 



1911. The Disciplinary Value of Geography. Pop. Sci. Mo., 



Vol. LXXVIH, pp. 105-119, 223-240. 

 An illuminating paper on the "art of presentation" 



of scientific results in oral and written form. 

 1909. The Systematic Description of Land Forms. Geogr. 

 Jour., Vol. XXXIV, pp. 300-318. 



1909. Glacial Erosion in North Wales. Quart. Jour. Geol. 



Soc., Vol. LXV, pp. 281-350. 



1910. Experiments in Geographical Description. Bull. 



Amer. Geogr. Soc., Vol. XLH, pp. 401-435. 



1911. The Colorado Front Range. A Study in Physio- 



graphic Presentation. Ann. Associa. Amer. Geogr., 

 Vol. I, pp. 21-83. 



The four preceding papers are in many respects models 

 of presentation. They exemplify the process method 

 applied to regions, a phase of much importance in 

 certain ecologic studies, particularly ecological sur- 

 veys. The last two papers are rather detailed ap- 

 plications of the same ideas. A very profitable 

 study may be made of the method of presentation 

 in these papers. 



