166 



CHARLES R. STOCKARD AND A. L. JOHNSON 



ments were rearranged for interorbital width in a sequence 

 from widest to narrowest, and the least frontal widths were 

 then placed in the same sequence. With this arrangement 

 (text-fig. 14), a gentle and regular slope for interorbital 

 widths results, but the measurements for least frontal width 

 in the same sequence (text-fig. 15) give an entirely different 



60 



So 



tfo 



/o- 



Text-figure 14. Sequence C. Interorbital width. Group of seventy skulls 

 arranged in sequence from greatest to least interorbital distance. 



So- 



/O 



Text-figure 15. Sequence C. Least frontal width. Same skull sequence as 

 text-figure 14. 



