356 BULLETIN 44, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. 



discissa Wlk. 

 1865. Wlk., C. B. Mus., Het., xxxm, 1009, Semigia. 



1868. G. & R., Trails. Am. Ent. Soc., II, 88, = L. elongatus. 

 elongatus Grt. 



1865. Grt., Proc. Ent. Soc. Phil., in, 85, pi. 2, f. 6, Litomitus. 

 1874. Grt., Bull. Buff. Soc. Nat. Sci., n, 39, pr. syn. 



HABITAT. Canada; Eastern, Middle, Central, and Southern States; 

 District of Columbia in August; Delaware in July. 



Guende's type is with M. Oberthu'r. The type of discissa is in the 

 British Museum. Mr. Grote's type I have not seen. 



C. bucetum Grt. 

 1883. Grt., Trans. Kans. Ac. Sci., vin, 50, Celiptcra. 



HABITAT. New Mexico. 

 The type is with Prof. Snow. 



Genus FAGITANA Wlk. 

 1865. Wlk., C. B. Mus., Het., xxxn, 615. 



P. littera Gn.* 



1852. Gn., Spec. Gen., Noct., i, 71, Leucania. 

 1856. Wlk., C. B. Mus., Het., ix, 77, Mytliimna. 

 1882. Grt., 111., Essay, 41, Psendolimacodcs. 



lucidata Wlk. 

 1865. Wlk., C. B. Mus., Het., xxxn, 645, Fagitana. 



niveicostatus Grt. 



1874. Grt., Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1874, 212, PseudoUmacodes. 



1875. Grt., Stett. Ent. Zeit., xxxvi, 199, PseudoUmacodes. 

 1882. Grt., 111. Essay, 41, pr. syn. 



HABITAT. New York; Massachusetts in July; Florida; Illinois. 



The Guene"e and Walker types are in the British Museum. Mr. 

 Grote's type I have not seen; but have seen a number of specimens 

 named by him. Walker's species was described without locality and 

 in such a way as to be not readily recognizable. As Fagitana has only 

 the one species, it must be used in preference to Mr. Grote's generic 

 term, under the rules. On the location of the genus I express no 

 opinion. Guenee considers it Leucaniid. Mr. Grote places it in its 

 present position on characters that seem valid to him. 



Genus PHURYS Gn. 

 1852. Gn., Spec. Gen., Noct., in, 303. 



The genera in this series need revision. The differences between 

 Celiptera, PJmrys, and some species of Poapkila are difficult to make 

 out; but I have in most cases left matters as they were, since any 

 changes here could be only tentative and liable to further change on 

 critical study. There are, also, a number of Verzeichniss genera that 

 have not been applied, and which will probably have to be used to 

 replace one or more of the terms adopted here. They are all indicated 

 in the synonymy. The specific unions are all correct I believe. 



