i about equal si/.e. terminal part about as long as those two joints com- 

 bined. Posterior antenna- with the outer rainus very small, uniarticulate, carrying 

 ,,n the tip. <>ral parts about a& in L. tenuieornis. 1st pair of legs 

 in structure those in L. ntl, nnndi, the inner ramus being composed 

 "ints. apical elaw and seta comparatively slender. The 3 succeeding 

 - .if l.- L 's likewise .,t' a structure very similar to that in the said species; inner 

 itli pair however composed of only 2 joints, like that of the 2 preceding 

 pa Last pair of legs with the distal joint wholly confluent with the proximal 



. ii let; forming an undivided small lamella of somewhat irregular form, 

 exhibiting in the middle of the posterior edge a slight incision, whereby 2 short 

 Inhales may lie distinguished, the outer one carrying 5 thin bristles, the inner 4 

 spinifoim set;u. Ovisac comparatively small, with a very limited number of ova. 

 Mai- rather smaller than female and having the anterior antenna? hinged 

 in the usual manner. Last pair of legs resembling in shape those in female, but 

 having a smaller number of marginal seta?, which also are more spiniform in 

 appearam 



lour not yet ascertained. 



I., ngth of adult female 0.68 mm. 



/,' ni'irh. This form also distinguishes itself by a peculiarity not found 

 in any of the other species, viz, the complete fusion of the 2 joints of the last 

 pair of legs. In all other structural details, however, it shows a close affinity to 

 them, and aecMrdingh cannot be generically removed. The specific name here pro- 

 posed refers to the above-mentioned anomalous character. 



"iniir,. Only ~2 or 3 specimens of this form have hitherto come 

 under my notice. They were found in the same samples from which the 2 prc- 

 d:iiL' species were derived. 



( n. Phyllocamptus, Scott, I8 ( r> 



' 'haracters. l!..dy sub-cylindrical in form, with rather thin integu- 



I,' '-tral projection very small. (Jenital segment in female imperfectly sub- 



idal rami short. Anterior antenna- less slender than in the preceding 



!' tenor antenna- likewise mon- strongly built, with the outer ramus 



1-r. though composed of ,,nly a single joint. Mandibles moderately strong, 



omparaiively -mall, biarticiilate. .Maxilla- and maxillipods nearly as in the 



pair of l.-gs unusually short and stout, with the outer ramus 



'he inner, the hitter biarticiilate. The 3 succeeding pairs of 



