432 NEW ENGLAND FISHERIES 



States in that behalf, the above mentioned commercial 

 privileges, the Treaty containing nothing to the contrary. 

 But they cannot at the same time and during the same voy- 

 age exercise their Treaty rights and enjoy their commer- 

 cial privileges, because Treaty rights and commercial 

 privileges are submitted to different rules, regulations and 

 restraints. 



For these reasons this Tribunal is of opinion that the 

 inhabitants of the United States are so entitled in so far as 

 concerns this Treaty, there being nothing in its provisions 

 to disentitle them provided the Treaty liberty of fishing 

 and the commercial privileges are not exercised concur- 

 rently and it is so decided and awarded. 



Done at the Hague, in the Permanent Court of Arbitra- 

 tion, in triplicate original, September 7th, 1910. 



H. LAMMASCH. 



A. F. DE SAVORNIN LOHMAN. 

 GEORGE GRAY. 

 C. FITZPATRICK. 

 Luis M. DRAGO. 



Signing the Award, I state pursuant to Article IX clause 

 2 of the Special Agreement my dissent from the majority 

 of the Tribunal in respect to the considerations and enact- 

 ing part of the Award as to Question V. 



Grounds for this dissent have been filed at the Inter- 

 national Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. 



Luis M. DRAGO. 



