INDEX OF LITEBATUKE 



INTRODUCTION AND MORPHOLOGY 



( ! ) E. HAECKEL, Generelle Morphologic der Organismen, 1866, p. 52. ( 2 ) FRITZ 

 MULLER, Fiir Darwin, 1864. ( 3 ) CHARLES DARWIN, On the Origin of Species by 

 Means of Natural Selection, 1859. ( 4 ) HUGO DE TRIES, Die Mutationstheorie, 

 1901-1903. ( 5 ) CARL NAGELI, Mechanisch-physiologische Theorie der Abstam- 

 mungslehre, 1883. JULIUS SACHS, Flora, voL Ixxxii. 1896, p. 173. ( 6 ) R. v. 

 WETTSTEIN, most recently in Handbuch der systematischen Botanik, 1901, p. 40. 



( 7 ) Cf. John Butler-Burke in " Nature," 1905, pp. 78, 294, 492 ; this investigator's 

 results have been widely published in the daily press. On the other side see 

 especially the review by W. Roux, Wochenschrift iiber die Fortschritte und 

 Bewegungen auf dem Gesamtgebiete der Wissenschaft und Technik, 1906, No. 8. 



( 8 ) Another interpretation is given by K. GOEBEL, Organography of Plants, 

 1898-1901 [English translation, 1900-1905]. ( 9 ) K. GOEBEL, loc. cit. and 

 Vergleichende Entwickelungsgeschichte der Pflanzenorgane, 1883 ; F. PAX, 

 Allgemeine Morphologic der Pflanzen, 1890. ( 10 ) K. GOEBEL, Organography, 

 vol. i. p. 19, vol. ii. p. 35. ( H ) K. GOEBEL, loc. cit. vol. i. p. 42. ( 12 ) K. GOEBEL, 

 Biol. Zentralbl. vol. xxii. 1908, p. 388. ( 13 ) K. GOEBEL, Organography, vol. ii. 

 p. 241. ( 14 ) A. W. EICHLER, Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Blattes, 1865. 

 ( 15 ) K. GOEBEL, Organography, vol. ii. p. 308. ( 16 ) M. RACIBORSKI, Flora, 

 vol. Ixxxvii. 1900, p. 1. ( n ) v. DEINEGA, Flora, vol. Ixxxv. 1898, p. 439. ( 18 ) 

 Ann. du Jard. Bot. de Buitenzorg, vol. ii. 1893, p. 98. ( 19 ) K. GOEBEL, Organo- 

 graphy, vol. ii. p. 350. t 20 ) K. GOEBEL, Bot. Ztg. 1880, p. 753. ( 21 ) S. SCHWEN- 

 DENER, Mechanische Theorie der Blattstellungen, 1878, together with numerous 

 papers in the Stzber. d. Akad. d. Wiss. zu Berlin. C 22 ) HANS WINKLER, Jahrb. f. 

 wiss. Bot. vol. xxxvi. 1901, p. 1, and vol. xxxviii. 1903, p. 501 ; further literature 

 in these papers, p) WIESNER, Biol. Zentralbl. vol. xxiii. 1903, p. 209. ( M ) 

 K. GOEBEL, Arb. d. bot. Inst. in Wiirzburg, vol. ii. 1882, pp. 357 ff., and Biol. 

 Zentralbl. vol. xxii. 1902, p. 389. ( M ) FREIDENFELT, Flora, vol. xci. 1902, p. 115. 

 ( 26 ) ROSTOWZEW, Flora, vol. xlviii. 1890, p. 155, and K. GOEBEL, Organography, 

 vol. ii. p. 226. C 27 ) A. F. W. SCHIMPER, Die epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas, 

 1888. C 28 ) EUG. WARMING, most recently in ENGLER and PRAXTL, Nat. Pflanzen- 

 familien, 3. Teil, Abt. 2a, 1891, p. 2. ( 29 ) K. GOEBEL, Flora, vol. xcv. 1905, 

 p. 165. C* ) K. GOEBEL, Organography, vol. ii. p. 226. ( 31 ) Cytologische Studien 

 aus dem Bonner botauischen Institut, Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot. vol. xxx. 1897, p. 155. 

 FR. MEVES, Verhandl. d. Anat. Gesell., sechzehnte Vers., Halle, 1902, p. 152. 

 M. KOERNICKE, Der heutige Stand der pflanzlichen Zellforschung., Ber. d. 



691 



