STYRACE2E. 



95 



indistincte pentadelpha, filamentis complanato-teretibus glabris vel basi obscure 

 paucissime barbatis vel hand barbatis. Ovarium apice disco brevissime 

 annuliformi glabro coronatum 3-loculare, stylo recto columnari-filiformi 6 mm. 

 longo glabro apice plus minus dilatato stigmatifero. 



HAB. in niontibus centralibus, leg. U. MOEI. 



Very near S. cuspidata BRAND (in EXGLER Pfl.- 

 reich Symplocaceas p. 69, n. 185). So far as I 

 can judge from the original description of BRAND, I 

 can not detect any difference between this and my 

 species, except the leaves which are in our plant are 

 a little narrower. As BRAND'S description is very short 

 and gives no account about the venation of the leaves, 

 ifc is at present impossible to decide whether the two 

 are the same or not. 



Symplocos adinandrifolia HAYATA var. thei- 

 folia HAYATA n. v. (Fig. 24). Frutex ? ramulis gra- 

 cilibus fusco-iiigricantibus tenuiter longitudinaliter 

 rugulosis glabris remote foliatis. Folia lanceolata vel 

 oblanceolata 12 cm. longa 33 mm. lata apice acuminata 

 vel cuspidato-acuminata ad summum breve aristata 

 basi cuneato-attenuata margine (basibus acuminibus 

 exceptis) serrulata, serrulis remotis interduni ad muc- 

 roneni reductis, mucronibus rubro-punctiformibus, costa 

 supra impressa subtus prominente elevata, venis venu- 

 lisque supra tenuiter impressis subtus gracillimis ele- 

 vatis reticulatis, venis lateralibus primariis utroque 

 latere costa? 5-6 angulo 45-40 a costa egressis, pagine 

 utraque glabra, petiolis 4-5 mm. longis glabris intus 

 sulcatis subtus convexis. Flores ut typicre. 



HAB. Kuraru, leg. H. INABA, Aug. 1911. 



Differs from the type by the remotely serrulate and a little broader leaves. 

 As the leaves are subject to some variation, the variety may be a mere form 

 of the type. I could not detect any difference between the flowers of the variety 



Fig. 24, Symplocos 

 adinandrifolia HAYATA 

 var. theifolia HAYATA. 



