list of my entomological publications etc. 
231 
132. Explanatory notice of my views on the Sub-orders ofDip- 
t e r a. 
Ent. M. Mag. London, July 1893, p. 149—150. 
This notice refers to my No. 130, 1892, above. The passage p. 150, line 5 
from top: “The position of the Pupipara I leave an open question” must be 
struck out, as there is no doubt that Pupipara belong to the Sub-order Cyclor- 
rhapha Athericera. 
133. On the so-called “Bugonia” of the Ancients, and its rela¬ 
tion to Eristalis tenax, a two-winged insect. 
Bullet, della Soc. Ent. Ital. 1893, p. 186—217. 
Offered to the Society in honor of the 25th anniversary of its foundation. 
(Reproduced, almost in extenso, in the “Annual Report of the Smithsonian In¬ 
stitution”, Washington, D. C. 1893, p. 487—500.) 
A second, much enlarged paper on the same subject was published by me 
later, as a separate pamphlet (see below, No. 142, 1894). 
134. Corrigendum concerning the “Bugonia” etc. 
Ent. M. Mag. London, 1893, p. 287 (two lines only). 
I had mistaken the moth Carpocarpsa pomonella, for Trypeta pomonella 
Walsh, a dipteron. 
135. Zur Geschichte der sogenannten Brustgrate ( breastbone ) der 
Cecidomgien, nebst einer Erinnerung an Karl Ernst von 
Baer. 
Berl. Ent. Z. 1893, p. 373—377. 
A passage of this paper has been misunderstood by Mr. Willis ton who, 
in his Manual etc. of N. A. Biptera, New Haven, 1896, p. 9, has the erroneous 
statement: “This organ, discovered by von Baer, has been called breast-bone by 
Ostcn Sacken”! 
136. Rejoinder to Prof. Brauer’s: “Thatsachliche Berichtigung” 
etc. in the Berl. Ent. Z. 1892, p. 487 — 489. 
Berl. Ent. Z. 1893, p. 378—379. 
To this paper Brauer replied in his “Bemerkungen” etc. in the Berl. 
Pint. Z. 1894, p.235, but this reply elicited immediately a short statement from 
Prof. L. C. Mi all (of Leeds, England) ibidem p.447: “Brauer’s quotation from 
Weismann refers to Chironomus , and not to Corethra, which has no place 
in this discussion” etc. This was one of the inadvertences Prof. Brauer is apt 
to commit in his hasty rejoinders. 
