Il6 THE 'ORIGIN OF SPECIES.' [i860. 



to give his view of the theory from the Botanical side. This 

 he did, demonstrating that the Bishop, by his own showing, 

 had never grasped the principles of the ' Origin,' * and that 

 he was absolutely ignorant of the elements of botanical sci- 

 ence. The Bishop made no reply, and the meeting broke up. 

 " There was a crowded conversazione in the evening at 

 the rooms of the hospitable and genial Professor of Botany, 

 Dr. Daubeny, where the almost sole topic was the battle of 

 the 'Origin,' and I was much struck with the fair and unpre- 

 judiced way in which the black coats and white cravats of 

 Oxford discussed the question, and the frankness with which 

 they offered their congratulations to the winners in the 

 combat."] 



C. Darwin to J. D. Hooker. 



Sudbrook Park, Monday night* 



[July 2nd, 1860I. 



My dear Hooker, — I have just received your letter. I 

 have been very poorly, with almost continuous bad headache 

 for forty-eight hours, and I was low enough, and thinking 

 what a useless burthen I was to myself and all others, when 

 your letter came, and it has so cheered me ; your kindness 

 and affection brought tears into my eyes. Talk of fame, 

 honour, pleasure, wealth, all are dirt compared with affection ; 

 and this is a doctrine with which, I know, from your letter, 

 that you will agree with from the bottom of your heart. 

 . . . How I should have liked to have wandered about 

 Oxford with you, if I had been well enough ; and how still 

 more I should have liked to have heard you triumphing 

 over the Bishop. I am astonished at your success and 

 audacity. It is something unintelligible to me how any one 

 can argue in public like orators do. I had no idea you had 

 this power. I have read lately so many hostile views, that I 

 was beginning to think that perhaps I was wholly in the 



* With regard to the Bishop's * Quarterly Review,' my father wrote : 

 " These very clever men think they can write a review with a very 

 slight knowledge of the book reviewed or subject in question." 



