NOTES. 261 



Dipteral. Beitnlge, III, p. 25 (1847). Also some further remarks in 

 Schles. Entom. Zeitschr. 1857; also DreprtHopliora, n. gen. of Sapromy- 

 zidae, in Bed. Ent. Zeitschr. XIII, p. 96. See also Haliday's note, 

 quoted above, in Nr. 309. 



311. Sapromyza vulgaris Fitch (Clilorops). It is easy to recognize 

 this species in the description of Dr. Fitch and in the figure. The de- 

 scription of CJtl. antennalis Fitch evidently contains some clerical error, 

 as it describes the antennae as plumose and alludes to those of Cld. 

 vulgaris as not plumose, while the latter are represented as plumose in 

 the figure. Mr. Loew followed the It'tUTjness and not the figure, and 

 hence called aiitetmalis the species in which I recognize vulyaris. (See 

 Loew, Zeitschr. f. Ges. Naturw. XXXVII, p. 117.) 



312. About Coelopa, compare Stenhammar, Copromyzinae Scandi- 

 naviae, 1853. 



313. About the species of Htteroneura occurring in Europe, com- 

 pare Loew, Wien. Ent. Monatsschr., Vol. I, 18i7, p. 51, and Berl. Ent. 

 Zeitschr. VIII, p. 334-346. 



314. Loew, Centur. Vol. II, p. 289, proposes to revive, instead of 

 Anthophilina , the older name of this genus Anthomyza Fallen, Sped n. 

 Entomol. 1810. The same argument is adduced by him in the Jalirb 

 d. k. k. Gel. Ges. in Krakau, Vol. XLI. But it seems to me that 

 Antliomyza is too much like Anthomyia and that there is a serious 

 objection against using names, so nearly alike, in the same order of 

 insects. Furthermore, as the name Anthomyza has been used by 

 Zetterstedt in the sense of Antliomyia , its reinstatement, in a different 

 acceptation, would be misleading. We have therefore the choice bet- 

 ween Leptomysa Macq. (1835) and Anthophilina Zetterstedt (1838). Dr. 

 Scbiner adopted the former, which, I suppose is the right course; but 

 until the question is decided, I retain the three north american species 

 under the name of Antliopliilina , under which they where originally 

 published by Dr. Loew. 



315. On the european Opomyzae, see Loew, Berl Ent. Zeitschr. IX, 1865, 

 p. 2633. On Balioptera, 1 c. VIII, 1864, p. 347-356. The subgenus 

 Tetlnna Haliday, in Westwood's Synopsis, p. 152, seems to have been 

 overlooked. 



3H>. SeDsidae. The following papers may be consulted-! 



1. Walker, F. Observations on the British Sepsidae (Ent. Magaz. 

 1833, p. 244-256. 



2. Loew, H. Ueber die Gatt. SaJtella uberhaupt etc. (Stett. Ent. Z. 

 1841, p. 182193). Contains useful systematic and historic data 

 about Sepsidae in general. 



3. Staeger, C. Systematisk Fremstelling af den danske faunas Arter 

 af Antliatslaegten ,sVyWx Kroyer's Tidskr. 1845, p. 22 3(i\ 



4. Van der Wulp. Jets over de in Nederland waargenomen Sepsinen. 

 (Tijdschr. v. Ent. Ser. 1, Vol. VII, p. 129-144, with a plate. 



317. Ephydridae, as preferable to Epliydrhiidae is adopted by Loinv, 

 in Ceatur. Vol. II. 



