io6 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY 



R. Babingtonii, Bell-Salter. [89]. 

 [R. Lejeunei, Wh. and N. 89]. 

 R. cavatifolius, P. J. Muell. [88 ?, 89]. 

 R. " humifusus." 72 and 87, "Top. Bot."]. 

 R. thyrsiger, Bab. [104]. 

 R. foliosus, Wh. and N. 93, 94, 89. 

 R. rosaceus, Wh. and N. (88, 89), 110? 

 var. hystri\, Wh. and N. 74 [88, 89]. 

 subsp. infecundus, Rogers. 97, 99. 

 subsp. Purchasianits. Rogers. [91, 92]. 

 R. Koehleri, Wh. and N. [87, 88, 89], 7.', 73. 



subsp., dasyphyllus, Rogers (van pallidus, Bab.). 73, 74, 75. 



76, 87, 94 98, 100 (72, 88, ?8 9 ). 



R. plinthostylus, Genev. Very doubtful as Scotch [73]. 

 R. serpens, Wh. and var. rivi/lar/s, M. and Wirtg [86]. 

 R. hirtus, W. and K. [73]. 

 [R. saxicolus, P. J. Muell. 87.] 

 R. ochrodermis, A. Ley. 80. 



R. dumetorum, Wh. and N., excluding the varieties named below. 

 1 06. 



var. ferox, Weihe. 81. 

 var. britannicus, Rogers. 86, 87, 88. 

 var. divers ifolh/s (Lindl.) (89, 106), [86]. 

 var. tuberculatus, Bab. (88, 89), [86], (83 Sonntag). 

 var. fasdculatus, P. J. Muell. [88, 89, 100]. 



R. corylifolius, Sm., agg. 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 81, 84, 86, 87, 

 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, TOO, 101, 104, 106, 107, 

 109, 1 10, <SV>, Wo. 



var. subhistris (L,ees). 75, 86, 88, 104, (73, 74, 77, 89, 91, 



92, 94). 

 var. cyclophyllus, Lindeb. 75, 76, 93, 101, (74, 86, 89, 91, 



92, 100), [88]. 



R. Balfourianus, Blox. Si, 108, (89), [88], 73, 107. 

 R. casius, L. 74, 75, 76, 80, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 91, 109, 73, 



81, 83, ?89. 



R. saxatilis, L. 72-77, 79-81, 83, 85, 87-112, 86. 

 R. chamtzmorus, L. 77, 78, 79, 80, 83, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 



93> 94, 95> 9 6 97, 9 8 , I0 5, Io6 > I0 7, Io8 , I0 9, ^, 75, 

 81, 99. 



[R. arcticus, L., was recorded in the "English Botany," ed. i. as found 

 on Ben-y-glo (89) and in Mull (103); but the records have 

 never been confirmed, and are believed to be due to error.] 



In Kennedy's "Clydesdale Flora'' (in memoriam edition, 1878) 

 the following are mentioned in addition to the records given above. 

 They are not included with the latter owing to uncertainty as to the 

 actual forms to which the records in the " Clydesdale Flora " refer. 



