MUTATIONS, VARIATIONS, AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE OENOTHERAS. 27 



The original measurements upon which the above figures and conclusions 

 are based are presented in the form of correlation tables in figs. 7 and 8. A 

 comparison of the tables with the corresponding figures for 1904 shows that 

 those representing 0. lamarckiana are very much alike in the two years, the 

 degree of correlation being even higher in the latter year than before, due in 

 part possibly to the slightly greater heterogeneity already pointed out in the 

 cultures at the Station for Experimental Evolution. On the other hand, in 

 Oenothera rubrinerms the corresponding tables for the two years are entirely 



15 



10 



20 25 30 35 4-0 45 50 55 60 65 7O 



FIG. 6. Comparison of the ratio between leaf-length and leaf-width in Oenothera 

 lamarckiana (broken curve) and O. rubrinerris. 



different, as would be expected from what has already been said. In this 

 species the coafficiant of correlation has been considerably lowered. 



The coefficients of correlation for the two species for the two years may 

 be compared in the following table: 



