RESIDUAL WATER NUCLEI. 



obtained. This is shown in table 57 and the charts (figs. 45 to 49), 

 in which the values of the earlier table 52 have been incorporated. 



The charts (figs. 45 to 49) show, however, that in all cases the fall of 

 computed curves, while not quite rapid enough at t /< 10, is somewhat 

 too rapid for the higher time intervals. It follows that 6 is less than 

 io~ 8 and c greater than 0.035. ^ we take the mean of the positive 

 values in table 56, 6 = 0.00079, = 0.039; but the provisional constants 

 in table 57 are in much better agreement with the observations than the 

 direct values. 



TABLE 57. Estimated constants b = ID-*, 0=0.0356. n given in thousands per cm 3 . 



1 Continued after i hour's rest. Too high. 



The question finally arises whether any systematic error in the 

 standardization of coronas, and hence in the values n, could have pro- 

 duced an effect equivalent to the occurrence of the constant c. The 

 equation may be written 



I 



