BIBLIOGRAPHY 17 



possible to do so and retain the genera proposed by Theobald, Nevertheless, 

 this classification is a distinct advance upon anything at that time proposed, 

 although in it, in common with most others, all the groups are disproportionately 

 magnified. The " subfamilies " are of no greater value than subtribes. In this 

 view we concur with Lahille and Williston, who have criticized this tendency to 

 exaggeration. Following Coquillett's work, Dyar and Knab produced a paper 

 in which an attempt was made to separate not only the higher groups, but also 

 the genera, on unobjectionable structural characters, and their arrangement was 

 adopted by Williston. We here adopt the same scheme, with sundry minor 

 corrections. 



In conclusion attention must be called to the very excellent revisional work 

 on Old World Culicida; accomplished in the last few years by F. W. Edwards 

 of the British Museum. A great deal of unsuspected synonymy has been estab- 

 lished and the species grouped in natural genera, due cognizance being taken of 

 genitalic and larval characters. While Mr. Edwards draws his genera some- 

 what more closely, he having been unwilling to discard altogether the secondary 

 sexual characters, his results in the main harmonize very well with those herein 

 set forth. 



BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR THE HISTORY OF CLASSIFICATION 



Linnaeus, Cakolus. Systema Naturae. Regnum animale, ed. 10 {Culex, p. 602-603), 



1758. (Reprint: Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash., xi, 30, 1909.) 

 Meigen, J. W. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten Buropaischen zweifliige- 



ligen Insekten, part I. (CwZea;, Anop^eZes, Aedes, pp. 1-10.) 1818. 

 RoBiNEAU-DESVoiDy, J. B. Essai sur la tribu des culicides. Memoires de la SociSte 



d'histoire naturelle de Paris, in, 390-413, 1827. 

 Lynch Abridalzaga, Felix. Dipterologfa Argentina. Culicidae. Revista del Museo de 



La Plata, i, 347-377; ii, 133-174, pis. 1-5. 1891. 

 Williston, S. W. On the Diptera of St. Vincent. Trans. Entom. Soc. London for 1896, 



253-446 (CulicidEe, p. 270-272, pi. viii, figs. 28, 29, 30; pi. ix, fig. 31). 1896. 

 Giles, G. M. A handbook of the gnats or mosquitoes, xii -j- 374 pp. London, 1900. 

 Blanchaed, R. Instructions a I'usage des medecins, des naturalistes et des voyag- 



eurs, redigees au nom de la commission du paludisme. Bull, de I'Acad. de 



Medecine, (3), xlfv, 3 juillet, 1900. (p. 31, Corethridae.) 

 Grassi, Battista. Studi di uno zoologo sulla malaria, 2 ed. (Anophelinse, Culicinse, 



pp. 95-112). Roma, 1901. 

 Theobald, F. V. The classification of mosquitoes. Journ. Trop. Med., iv, 229-235, 



1901. 

 . A monograph of the Culicidae or mosquitoes, i, xviii + 424 pp.; ii, viii + 391 



pp. 1901. 

 Blanchard, Raphael. Observations sur quelques Moustiques. Comptes Rendus 



hebdom. Soc. Biol., Paris, liii, 1045-1046. 1901. 

 NE^^u-LEMAlRE. Sur la classification des Culicides. C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, liv, 1329- 



1332. 1902. 

 . Classification de la famille des Culicidae. Mem. Soc. Zool. France, xv, 195- 



227, 12 figs. 1902. 

 Giles, G. M. A handbook of the gnats or mosquitoes. 2 ed., xii -j- 530 pp., figs., pis. 



1902. 

 Theobald, F. V. The classification of the Anophelina. Jour. Trop. Med., v, 181-183, 



1902. 

 Blanchard, R. Sur le demembrement des Anophelinw. C. R. hebd. Soc. Biol., Paris, 



LIV, 794-795. 1902. 

 Theobald, F. V. A monograph of the Culicidae or mosquitoes, in, xviii -|- 359 pp. 1903. 

 Lahille, F. Notes sur la classification des moustiques. {Extrait de Actas y Trabajos 



del Segundo Congreso Medico Latino-Americano, to7no ii) 23 pp., 4 figs., 1 



chart. Buenos Ayres, 1904, 



2 



