CULISETA IMPATIENS 483 



July 15 (H. S. Barber) ; San Diego, California, February 3, 1906 (J. M. 

 French; Dyar & Caudell) ; Los Angeles, California, June 10 (H. G. Dyar) ; 

 Pasadena, California (H. G. Dyar) ; Stanford University, California, October 

 11, 1900 (Isabel McCracken) ; Dunsmuir, California (A. N. Caudell) ; Eureka, 

 California (A, N. Caudell) ; San Francisco, California (A. N. Caudell) ; Kla- 

 math Falls, Oregon (Dyar & Caudell) ; Ormsby Co., Nevada, July 6 (C. F. 

 Baker) ; Portland, Oregon (E. P. Currie; H. C Dyar) ; Kent, Washington, 

 June 30, 1905 (H. E. Burke) ; Vancouver, British Columbia, August 6 (Dyar 

 & Caudell) ; Wellington, British Columbia (H. G. Dyar) ; Kaslo, British Co- 

 lumbia (Dvar, Caudell and Currie) ; Bennett, British Columbia, June 1, 1903 

 (N. Hollister) ; Fieldbrook, California, May 30, 1903 (H. S. Barber) ; Bair's 

 Eanch, Eedmond Creek, Humbolt Co., California, June 11 (H. S. Barber) ; 

 Lewiston, Idaho, June 16, 1902 (J. M. Aldrich) ; Stockton, California (H. J. 

 Quayle) ; Victoria, British Columbia, August 13 (Dyar and Caudell) ; San Jose, 

 California, Mav 18, 1906 (I. McCracken) ; Yosemite National Park, June 13, 

 1904 (A. D. Hopkins) ; Big Fork, Montana (Edith Eicker) ; Oakland, Cali- 

 fornia (I. McCracken) ; Arden, California (I. McCracken) ; Claxton, British 

 Columbia, July, 1901 (J. H. Keen) ; Metlakahtla, British Columbia, June 3, 

 1901, May 15, 1903 (J. H. Keen) ; Moscow, Idaho, October 28, 1901 (J. M. 

 Aldrich) ; Kendrick, Idaho, May 25, 1902 (J. M. Aldrich) ; Banff, Alberta (H. 

 0. Dyar) ; Plateau Canon, Grand Junction, Colorado, August 33, 1906 (E. P. 

 Taylor). Also reported from California (Thomson) ; Pecos, New Mexico, Mos- 

 cow, Idaho, Corvallis, Oregon (Theobald) ; Seattle and Pullman, Washington 

 (Aldrich). 



This species was fully described by Thomson, but was nevertheless mixed up 

 with some of the black-legged species of Aedes by later authors, to be finally sepa- 

 rated out again. It is a very distinct form, superficially resembling Anopheles 

 quadrimaculatus Say, so much so as to sometimes cause confusion in a super- 

 ficial examination, especially in the case of males. There is, of course, no real 

 relationship between these species. Theobald has described the larva of this 

 species as that of his Grabhamia vittata (Can. Ent., xxxv, 315, 1903). 



CULISETA IMPATIENS (Walker). 



Culex im'patiens Walker, List Dipt. Brit. Mus., i, 5, 1848. 



Culex pinguis Walker, Lord's Naturalist in Vane. Id. & Brit. Col., ii, 337, 1866. 



Culex pinguis Walker, Hardwicke's Science-Gossip for 1867, 81, 1867. 



Culex impatiens Giles, Gnats or Mosq., 293, 1900. 



Culex pinguis Giles. Gnats or Mosq., 342, 1900. 



Culex consobrinus Coquillett (in part, not Desvoidy), Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci., ii, 395, 



1900. 

 Culex consobrinus Coquillett (in part, not Desvoidy), U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Ent., 



Circ. No. 40, 7, 1900. 

 Culex consobrinus Theobald (in part, not Desvoidy), Mon. Culic, ii, 78, 1901. 

 Culex consobrinus Giles (in part, not Desvoidy), Gnats or Mosq., 2 ed., 445, 1902. 

 Culex absobrinus Felt, Bull. 79, N. Y. State Mus., 278, 280, 318, 1904. 

 CuUseta absobrinus Felt, Bull. 79, N. Y. State Mus., 391c, 1904. 

 Culex consobrinus Dyar (not Desvoidy), Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash., vi, 41, 1904. 

 Culex inornatus Aldrich (in part, not Williston), Cat. N. A. Dipt., 129, 1905. 

 CuUseta absobrinus Felt, Bull. 97, N. Y. State Mus., 448, 481, 1905. 

 Culex absobrinus Dyar, Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc, xiii, 24, 1905. 

 Theobaldia absobrinus Dyar, Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc, xiii, 107, 1905. 

 CuUseta absobrinus Dyar & Knab, Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc, xiv, 204, 1906. 

 CuUseta absobrinus Coquillett, Science, n. s., xxiii, 313, 1906. 

 CuUseta absobrinus Coquillett, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent., Tech. Ser. 11, 22, 1906. 

 CuUseta absobrinus Dyar, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Ent., Circular No. 72, 4, 1906. 

 CuUseta absobrina Theobald (in part), Mon. Culicid., iv, 383, 1907. 

 CuUseta absobrina Theobald, Mon. Culic, v, 322, 1910. 

 Culex consobrinus Theobald (not Desvoidy)^ Mon. Culic, v, 358, 1910. 

 Culex pinguis Theobald, Mon. Culic, v, 397, 1910. 



