130 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [Vol. LXXIV 



length of tegmen 34.4, least (median) width of tegmen 4.3, greatest 

 (distal) width of tegmen 4.8, length of cephalic femur 9.6, length of 

 caudal femur 23.7 mm. 



Elimaea roseo-alata Brunner. Plate XI, figures 10 and 11. 



1891. Elimaea roseo-alata Brunner, Verh. Zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, XL1, 

 p. 49. [ 9 ; Deli, Sumatra.] 



Goenong Soegi, Lampond, Sumatra, October and November, 

 1901, (Harrison and Hiller), lcf, [Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.]. 



We do not agree with Dohrn in considering roseo-alata a synonym 

 of parumpunctata (Serville). 



The following characters are given for the hitherto undescribed 

 male sex. Tegmina widest meso-proximad, narrowing strongly 

 mesad, then very slightly to the broadly rounded apex; anal field 

 dark brown, with veinlets light brown; discoidal field light brown 

 with very numerous minute flecks of dark brown toward anal 

 vein and larger (twenty or more) flecks mesad in areolae of discoidal 

 field. Wings with veins pink and intervening portions hyaline 

 and strongly (pink and green) iridescent. Dorsal surface of ab- 

 domen pink. Tibiae suffused distad. Supra-anal plate nearly 

 twice as long as proximal width, lateral margins weakly convergent 

 proximad, then nearly parallel, rounding into the truncate apex. 

 Cerci cylindrical, strongly curved inward, particularly distad, 

 there tapering sharply off into a long, sharp, slightly curved, apical 

 spine. Subgenital plate elongate, tapering strongly proximad, 

 the long and narrow shaft beyond with lateral margins very weakly 

 concave, the apex itself rather deeply cleft; the two portions thus 

 formed projecting latero-distad and acute-angulate. 



Length of body 17, length of pronotum 4.3, least width of pro- 

 notum 1.3, greatest (caudal) width of pronotum 2.7, length of 

 tegmen 30, greatest (meso-proximal) width of tegmen 6.4, least 

 (distal) width of tegmen 3.8, length of cephalic femur 8, length of 

 caudal femur 21.8 mm. 



Mirollia aeta new species. Plate XI, figures 12 and 13. 



This insect is readily distinguished from the Javanese genotype, 

 carinata, by its smaller size, weak though distinct limb spination 

 and, in the male sex, the strikingly distinctive genitalic special- 

 ization. 14 



A full generic diagnosis has been given by Brunner. 15 



14 It is very possible that the female recorded by Karny as M. carinata (Haan), 

 from Mount Makiling, Luzon, Philippine Islands, represents this species (Philip- 

 pine Jour. Sci., XVIII, p. 6 IS, {1921).) 



16 Monogr. der Phaneropteriden, p. 106 and pi. I, figs, a to c, (1875). 



