80 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [Feb., 



Melanoplus defectus (p. 177). 



Based on a pair from the same locality. 



Single type here designated: unique figured d" ; Grand Junction, 

 Mesa County, Colorado, June, [1893]; L. Bruner; Hebard Col- 

 lection, ex Bruner. 



Melanoplus diminutus (p. 19(5). 



Based on five males and nine females from three localities. 



Single type here designated : figured <? ; Monterey, Calif ornia, 

 October 19, next seashore; Scudder Collection. 



Melanoplus consanguineus (p. 192). 



Based on a pair from a single locality. 



Single type here designated : unique figured d" ; [Sonoma 13 ] 

 County, California, October; [Koebele]; U. S. N. M. Collection. 



Melanoplus sierranus (p. 193). 



Based on twenty-eight male and twenty-three female specimens 

 from three localities. 



Single type here designated: figured d 1 ; Truckee, Nevada 

 County, California, October 10; Scudder Collection. 



Melanoplus ater (p. 194). 



Based on two males and three females from one locality. 



Single type here designated: figured d" ; San Francisco, Cali- 

 fornia, November, [1887]; Hebard Collection, ex Bruner. 



Melanoplus virgatus (p. 199). 



Based on eleven males and twelve females from six localities. 



Single type here designated 14 : cf ; Siskiyou County, California, 

 July; Riley; Scudder Collection. 



Melanoplus uniformis (p. 201). 



Described from nine male and eight female specimens from five 

 localities. 



Single type here designated: figured c? ; Sacramento County, 

 California; Coquillett; U. S. N. M. Collection. 



13 Sacramento County instead of Sonoma County has been given by mistake 

 in the original description, and for the same specimen, Sonora County in the 

 plate reference. 



14 As the figured specimen of this species is probably lost, having been sent to 

 McNeill, we have chosen a specimen from the first definite locality given as the 

 single type. 



