1912.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 161 



Based on material misidentified as (Edvpoda cincta Thomas, by 

 Bruner, Scudder, etc. 



Single type here designated; figured 2 ?; no data. Type lost. 



Ar.EOPTERYX PENELOPE. 



Can. EnL, Vol. XXXIII, p. 102, 1901. 



Based on a single female specimen from Prescott, Arizona, Septem- 

 ber 29, 1900; Dr. R. E. Kunze; U. S. N. M. Collection. 



PsiNIDIA SULCIFRONS 3 AMPLICORNUS. 



Proc. U. S. N. M., Vol. XXVI, p. 791, PI. LV, fig. 2, 1903. 

 Based on a pair from the same locality. 



Single type here designated: unique figured 9 ; Victoria, Texas, 

 June, 1902; Caudell; U. S. N. M. Collection. 



Trimerotropis SCHAEFFERI. 



Mus. Brooklyn Inst. Arts and Sci. Bulletin, Vol. I, No. 4, p. 112, 

 PI. VII, fig. 1, 1904. 



Described from two males from the same locality. 



Single type here designated: figured d* ; Topo, near Brownsville, 

 Texas, May [1903]; [Chas. Schaeffer]; Mus. Brooklyn Inst, Arts 

 and Sci. Collection. 



Trimerotropis titusi. 



Proc. EnL Soc. Wash., Vol. VII, Nos. 2, 3, p. 125, 1906. 



Based on eight males and three females from the same locality. 



Single type here designated: d* ; Spreckles, Monterey County, 

 California, September 20, 1904, on sugar beets; E. S. G. Titus; 

 U. S. N. M. Collection. 



Heliastus benjamini. 



Proc. U. S. N. M., Vol. XXVIII, p. 474, fig. 6, 1905. 

 Based on one male and two females from two localities. 

 Single type here designated: figured 9 ; Huachuca Mountains, 

 Arizona, August 16, 1903; E. J. Oslar; U. S. N. M. Collection. 



Heliastus sumichrasti subrosea. 



Proc. U. S. N. M., Vol. XXVII, p. 951, fig. 3, 1904. 

 Based on a pair from a single locality. 



2 This figure is very good, excepting the fact that the wing has the transverse 

 band drawn too near its apex. 



3 This should be fenestralis, correction made, Can. EnL, Vol. XXXVIII, 

 p. 204, 1906. 



