210 THE POPULAR SCIENCE MONTHLY. 



which it has acquired, and in the other to the position at which it rests, 

 and to its capability of falling again when the support is removed. 

 Energy in the first of these states is called " Energy of Motion," or 

 " Kinetic Energy," and that in the second state, " Energy of Position," 

 or " Potential Energy." In the case supposed, at the moment of 

 starting, the whole of the energy is kinetic ; as the body rises, the en- 

 ergy becomes partly potential and partly kinetic ; and when it reaches 

 the highest point the energy has become wholly potential. If the 

 body be again dropped, the process is reversed. 



The history of a discovery, or invention, so simple at first sight, is 

 often found to be more complicated the more thoroughly it is examined. 

 That which at first seems to have been due to a single mind proves to 

 have been the result of the successive action of many minds. Attempts 

 more or less successful in the same direction are frequently traced out ; 

 and even unsuccessful efforts may not have been without influence on 

 minds turned toward the same object. Lastly, also, germs of thought, 

 originally not fully understood, sometimes prove in the end to have 

 been the first stages of growth toward ultimate fruit. The history of 

 the law of the conservation of energy forms no exception to this order 

 of events. There are those who discern even in the writings of New- 

 ton expressions which show that he was in possession of some ideas 

 which, if followed out in a direct line of thought, would lead to those 

 now entertained on the subjects of energy and of work. But, however 

 this may be, and whosoever might be reckoned among the earlier con- 

 tributors to the general subject of energy, and to the establishment of 

 its laws, it is certain that within the period of which I am now speak- 

 ing, the names of Seguin, Clausius, Helmholtz, Mayer, and Colding, on 

 the Continent, and those of Grove, Joule, Rankine, and Thomson, in 

 this country, will always be associated with this great work. 



I must not, however, quit this subject without a passing notice of 

 a conclusion to which Sir William Thomson has come, and in which 

 he is followed by others who have pursued the transformation of en- 

 ergy to some of its ultimate consequences. The nature of this will 

 perhaps be most easily apprehended by reference to a single instance. 

 In a steam-engine, or other engine, in which the motive power depends 

 upon heat, it is well known that the source of power lies not in the 

 general temperature of the whole, but merely on the difference of tem- 

 perature between that of the boiler and that of the condenser. And 

 the effect of the condenser is to reduce the steam issuing from the 

 boiler to the same temperature as the condenser. When this is once 

 done, no more work can be got out of the engine, unless fresh heat be 

 supplied from an outside source to the boiler. The heat originally 

 communicated to the boiler has become uniformly diffused, and the 

 energy due to that difference is said to have been dissipated. The 

 energy remains in a potential condition as regards other bodies ; but 

 as regards the engine, it is of no further use. Now, suppose that we 





