322 



SUMMARIES OF THE HISTOLOGIC CHARACTERS, ETC. 



SUMMARY OF TABLE F. Recapitulation of the Sum-totals of the Reaction-intensities of the Starches of all of the Hybrids as regards 

 Sameness, Intermcdialeness, Excess, and Deficit of Development of Different Hybrids in relation to the Parents. 



Hybrids. 



Same as 



seed 

 parent. 



Same as 

 pollen 

 parent. 



Same as 



both 

 parents. 



Inter- 

 mediate. 



Highest. 



Lowest. 



Brunsdonna sanderce alba 4 



Brunsdonna sanderce 6 



Hippeastrum titan-cleonia 2 



Hippeastrum ossultan-pyrrha 3 



Hippeastrum dseones-zephyr 



Hsemanthus andromeda 8 



Hsemanthus konig albert 15 



Crinum hyhridum j. c. h 



Crinum kircape 4 



Crinum powellii 



Nerine dainty maid 1 



Nerine queen of roses 2 



Nerine giantess 2 



Nerine abundance 3 



Nerine glory of sarnia 1 



Narcissus poeticus herrick 



Narcissus poeticus dante 1 



Narcissus poctaz triumph 2 



Narcissus fiery cross 1 



Narcissus doubloon 2 



Narcissus cresset 2 



Narcissus will scarlet 2 



Narcissus bicolor apricot 3 



Narcissus madame de graaff 4 



Narcissus pyramus 1 



Narcissus lord roberts 3 



Narcissus agnes harvey 4 



Narcissus j. t. bennett poe 2 



Lilium marhan 



Lilium dalhansoni 4 



Lilium golden gleam 4 



Lilium testaceum 4 



Lilium burbanki 2 



Iris ismali 3 



Iris dorak 5 



Iris mrs. alan grey 



Iris pursind 3 



Gladiolus colvillei 7 



Tritonia crocosmaiflora 2 



Begonia mrs. heal 9 



Begonia ensign 



Begonia Julius 1 



Begonia success 2 



Richardia mrs. roosevelt 1 



Musa hybrida 1 



Phaius hybridus 1 



Miltonia bleuana 3 



Cymbidium eburneo-lowianurn 4 



Calanthe veitchii 2 



Calanthe bryan 1 



Total number of reactions 137 



Per cent of 1018 reactions 13.4 



Per cent of sameness and of intermediateness, highest and lowest. 





 

 3 

 

 2 

 

 

 12 

 1 

 3 

 2 

 1 

 6 

 3 

 6 

 3 

 4 

 2 

 2 

 1 

 3 

 1 

 1 

 2 

 

 1 

 

 

 5 

 1 

 4 

 3 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 1 

 2 

 

 1 

 

 

 1 

 3 

 

 3 

 3 

 

 

 1 

 



94 

 9.2 



1 

 1 

 8 

 8 

 9 

 6 

 

 

 

 

 7 

 7 

 7 

 7 

 8 

 

 

 1 

 

 1 

 

 1 

 1 

 



1 

 1 



1 





 9 

 9 

 5 

 2 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 3 

 5 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 

 

 

 4 

 

 5 

 3 

 9 

 

 



138 

 13.6 



5 

 2 

 4 

 3 

 6 



11 

 7 

 5 



18 

 2 

 6 

 3 

 6 

 S 

 1 

 3 

 4 

 

 2 

 4 

 

 2 



4 



3 







6 



9 



2 



7 



6 

 12 



1 



1 



5 



4 

 16 

 14 



7 



4 



2 



3 



2 



11 



1 







5 

 11 



236 

 23.2 



3 



3 



5 

 11 



5 







1 



2 



2 

 21 



8 

 11 



1 



1 







2 

 ' 1 

 20 



2 







3 



4 







1 



4 







1 



8 



1 



2 



7 



6 







1 

 11 



4 



5 







3 







1 



4 



3 



4 







3 

 17 







4 



1 



187 

 18.4 



13 

 14 



4 



1 



4 



1 



3 



7 



1 







2 



2 



4 



9 

 10 



2* 



0* 



1 



3 



2* 



2* 



0* 



3* 



2* 



2* 



1* 



1* 



0* 



5 



1 



4 



4 

 16 

 16 



4 

 17 



6 

 14 



2 



1 



2* 



0* 



0* 



1* 

 20 



3 



2 

 13 



1* 



0* 



226 

 22.2 



36.2 



* Number of reactions = 10 or 13. 



REACTION-INTENSITIES OF EACH HYBRID STARCH IN 



RELATION TO SAMENESS AND INCLINATION TO 



EACH PARENT AND BOTH PARENTS. 



(Table G.) 



The data included in Table F, Parts 1 to 50, can be 

 given a setting that will show quite clearly, although 

 somewhat grossly, the comparative degrees of influence 

 that have been exerted by each of the parents on the 

 properties of the starch of the hybrid. Such a presenta- 

 tion will be found in Table G. From the figures here 

 formulated it will be seen that the various hybrids ex- 



hibit the widest differences in their parental bearings, 

 there being all gradations between one extreme where 

 with the exception of 3 reactions of 26 there is same- 

 ness or inclination to the seed parent (as in Htcmantluts 

 konig albert and Begonia, mrs. heal) and the other ex- 

 treme where with the exception of 1 or 2 reactions of 

 26 the corresponding relationship is borne to the pollen 

 parent (as in Crinum hybriduni j. c. It., C. powellii, 

 Gladiolus colvillei, and Musa hi/brida). In most of the 

 hybrids there is a quite definite leaning to one or the 

 other parent. Tn summing up the total number of reac- 

 tions in each column it is found that of 1,018 reactions 



