to 

 Aecidium Phaeelise, Pk. 



Note. Sydow 1902 suggests that this may belong to Puccinia Phacelice, 

 Syd. & Holw. 



Pk. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 1 1 : 50. d. May 1884. 



Hark. Bull. Cal. Acad. 2 : 440. 16 June 1887. 



Halsted, Bull. Iowa Agr. Coll. 1888 : 113, 116. April 1888. 

 *E11. & Ev. N. A. F. 22/5. Feb. 1889. 



Cke. Grev. 20 : no. June 1892. 



Sacc. Bull. Soc. Bot. Belg. 31 2 : 225. d. 1892. 



Sacc. Syll. 1 1 : 220. d. July 1895. 



McClatchie in Reid's Hist. Pasadena 616. 1895. 



McClatchie, Proc. S. Cal. Acad. 1 : 372. 5 June 1897. 



Hume, Proc. Davenport Acad. 7 : 252. 12 May 1899. 



Tracy & Earle in Greene, PI. Baker. 1 : 19. 22 Feb. 1901. 



Syd. Mon. Ured. 1 : 314. 15 Nov. 1902. 

 *Syd. Uredineen /Soo. 1903. 



Cockerell, Jour. Myc. 10: 51. 19 March 1904. 



Aecidium Phaseolorum, Auct. Amer. 



Note. See Aecidium on Amphicarpcea and Aecidium on Pkaseolus under 

 Aecidium on Leguminosie. 



Aecidium Phlogis, Arth. 



See Aecidium Gilise, Pk. Phlox divaricata. 

 See Aecidium Polemonii, Pk. Phlox pilosa. 



Aecidium Phlogis, Ell. & Ev. 

 See Aecidium Gilias, Pk. 



Aecidium Phrymae, Halsted. 



Halsted, Jour. Myc. 2: 52. d. May 1886. 

 De Toni in Sacc. Syll. 7 : 816. d. 28 Oct. 1888. 

 Pound, Bot. Surv. Nebr. 3 : 10. 18 June 1894. 

 Freeman, Minn. Bot. Studies II. 5 : 559. 20 July 1901. 



Aecidium Physalidis, Burrill. 

 See Aecidium Solan i, Mont. 



Aecidium Physalidis, Pk. 



NOTE. This name which so far as we know occurs only in the citation 

 below probably refers to the aecidium of Puccinia Physalidis, Pk., which is 

 perhaps the same as Aecidium Solaui, Mont. ; but authors are not agreed on 

 that point. 



Stuart, Proc. Ind. Acad. 1901 : 284. 1902. 



Aecidium Pimpinellse, Auct. Amer. 

 See Aecidium Osmorrhizse, Pk. 



Aecidium Pini, Auct. Amer. p. p. 



Note. Besides citations under cross references given below there are the 

 following references to Aecidium Pini in North America. Some relate to 

 corticolous and some to acicolous forms, but their development has not been 

 studied in this country. In Europe Aecidium Pini has been separated into 

 a number of forms, the acicolous being in general connected with species of 

 Coleosporium and the corticolous with species of Cronartium. For details 

 see Klebahn, Rostpilze 358, 372, 377. 1904. 



In this country Coleosporium Senecionis appears to be rare and is not 

 accompanied, so far as known, by any Aecidium on leaves of Pinus; nor has 

 it been ascertained whether the common species of Cronartium on Myrica 

 is connected with the common form of Aecidium Pini on Pinus rigida with 

 which it is often found growing. It should be remarked that the common 



