SOME EIGHTEENTH CENTURY EVOLUTIONISTS. 335 



bears; from this everything in his history is explicable; without it 

 nothing is capable of explanation. . . . Why should we humble in the 

 dust the crown of our high calling, and shut our eyes to that central 

 point in which all the radii of Nature 's circle seem to converge ? ' ' 



In a later passage (Bk. VII., ch. 1) Herder directly discusses, only 

 to reject, the theories of those (he probably has Monboddo especially 

 in mind) who assert a kinship, or an identity of species, between the 

 apes and man. "I could wish," he writes, "that the affinity of man 

 to the ape had never been urged so far as to cause people to overlook, 

 in seeking a graded scale (Letter) of being, the actual steps and 

 intervals without which no scale can exist. What, for example, can the 

 rickety orang-outang explain in the figure of the Kamchatkan, the 

 pigmy chimpanzee in the size of the Greenlander, the pongo in the 

 Patagonian? for all these forms would have arisen from the nature 

 of man if there had been no such thing as an ape upon the earth. . . . 

 In point of fact, the apes and man were never one and the same species 

 (Gattung). For each race nature has done enough, to each she has 

 given its own proper heritage. The apes she has divided into as many 

 species and varieties as possible, and extended these as far as she could. 

 But thou, man, reverence thyself ! Neither the pongo nor the gibbon 

 is thy brother; the American and the Negro are. These then thou 

 shouldst not oppress nor kill nor rob, for they are men like thee; but 

 with the ape thou canst not enter into fraternity." Herder expresses 

 himself in a similar vein in a preface which he wrote for a German 

 translation (1784) of the work in which Lord Monboddo set forth, 

 among other things, his theory of the close relationship of man and 

 monkey. Herder praises cordially Monboddo 's taste for ancient art, 

 and his large and philosophical way of dealing with the problem of the 

 origin and development of human language; but he warns the reader 

 against Monboddo 's views on the orang-outang. The opinion that 

 ' Affe und Mensch em Geschlect sei' Herder marks as ' an error 

 which even the facts of anatomy contradict.' 



In another chapter of the 'Ideen' Herder speaks of the transitions 

 (Uebergange und Ueberleitungen) and metamorphoses (Verwand- 

 lungen) through which nature leads the successive orders of animals, 

 in a fashion which seems at first sight plainly to imply the derivation 

 of higher from lower species by ordinary descent; yet in the same 

 paragraph he pauses to insist upon the fixity of specific types : " It 

 may appear that such transitions are incompatible with the definite- 

 ness of form to which every species remains true, and in which not the 

 smallest bone undergoes alteration. But the reason for this invaria- 

 bility is apparent ; since every creature can receive its organization only 

 from other creatures of its own species. Our orderly Mother Nature 

 has thus plainly predetermined the way by which any organic power 



