72 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [March, 



Ceratinella moesta. 



This belongs to the restricted genus Lophocarenum. 



Ceratinella placida. 



This is related to C. emertoni, but I believe distinct, the tibial 

 process is much more slender, the style longer. I give figures of 

 other views of the palpus (PI. X, figs. 6, 11). 

 Ceratinella formosa. 



This is peculiar in the position of the shield, and for it I later 

 made the genus Idionella; it belongs to the true Theridiidae. 



Ceratinella annulipes. 



I made a new genus, Cerati?iops, for this, it belongs to the true 

 Theridiidae. I have seen it also from Poughkeepsie, N. Y. 



Ceratinopsis interpres. 



Now placed in a separate genus, Notionella. 

 Ceratinopsis nigriceps. 



Not nigriceps, but the species Emerton later described as C. 

 auriculatus. 



Ceratinopsis frontatus. 



Belongs to the genus Maso, and a description and figures are 

 given by Emerton under name of Caseola herbicola. 



Grammonota ornata. 



Probably correct, but the abdomen is shrunken now, and does 

 not show the markings. 

 Grammonota venusta. 



Probably the female of Tmeticus tridentatus, but the epigynum 

 (PI. XI, fig. 18) shows the ridges more divaricate than usual; possibly 

 the female of some allied species. 

 Spiropalpus spiralis. 



Now considered to belong to genus Cornicularia. 



Cornicularia communis. 



Probably correct, but the epigynum does not project quite as 

 far as in other specimens. 



Cornicularia pallida. 



An immature female, which agrees in markings and structure 

 with adults from other localities. 



Cornicularia formosa = Gonatium rubena Blk. 

 Cornicularia placida. 



A female Cornicularia, and probably the female of some described 

 species; the figure I gave of the epigynum is not broad enough, 



