32 WILLIAM KEITH BROOKS 



Liriope, Cunoctantha, Eutima, and Philalidium McCradyi are 

 classics of science in their thoroughness, wealth of accurate illus- 

 tration, and that subtle charm in description which was their 

 author's own. Through patient searching upon many a collecting 

 trip at Beaufort, he was the first to find and describe the hydroids 

 of Turritopsis, Nemopsis, Phortis, and Stomotoca, while his 

 studies along the shores of the Chesapeake led to discovery of the 

 ephyrse and early growth-stages of the free swimming medusa of 

 Dactylometra. 



His summers in the Bahamas led to the discovery of the re- 

 markable process of the development of medusa-bearing hydroid 

 blastostyles upon the gonads in Epenthesis (Philalidium) Mc- 

 Cradyi. He also sectioned and beautifully figured, the marginal 

 cordyli of Laodicea, and was the first to elucidate their structure 

 and homologies; and from the standpoint of morphology his de- 

 scription of Dichotomia cannoides in the Proceedings of the Amer- 

 ican Philosophical Society of Philadelphia, 1903, may well serve 

 as a model for those who essay to describe medusa?. 



It was in cooperation with Brooks that Conklin discovered that 

 in Physalia only male gonophores are found, while in another 

 siphonophore, Rodalia, only female gonophores occur, the infer- 

 ence being that in both forms the opposite sex is so different from 

 the one known that it may have been classed as a wholly different 

 genus. Another of his students, Rittenhouse, while working under 

 Brooks, gave an excellent account of the early stages of the devel- 

 opment of Turritopsis. 



Facts interested him but little unless they led toward generali- 

 zations, and thus it is that he wrote but one purely systematic 

 paper upon ccelenterates, and that all of his other work was directed 

 toward the study of developments and homologies as indicating 

 what has been the path of evolution. Such a problem as the rela- 

 tionship between ccelenterates and bilateral animals was accord- 

 ingly very attractive to him, and he was disposed to lay stress 

 upon the (somewhat masked) bilateral symmetry discovered by 

 himself in Eutima and by Hamahn in other hydroids. 



Brooks' views were not seldom in conflict with accepted theories, 

 as when in 1886 he came to the conclusion that the remote ances- 



