TRICHOCEREUS. 



137 



11. Trichocereus chiloensis (Colla). 



Cactus chiloensis Colla, Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino 31: 342. 1826. 



Cereiis chiloensis De Candolle, Prodr. 3: 465. 1828. 



Cereus chilensis PfeifTer, Enum. Cact. 86. 1837. 



Cereus panoplaeatus Monville, Hort. Univ. i: 220. 1840. 



Cereus heteromorphus Monville, Hort. Univ. 1:221. 1840. 



Cereus longispinus Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 1845. 



Cereus pepinianus Lemaire in Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 1845.* 



Cereus subulifenis Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 1845. 



Cereus gilvus Salm-Dyck, Allg. Gartenz. 13: 355. 1845. 



Cereus quisco Rcmy in Gay, Fl. Chilena 3:19. 1847. 



Cereus linnaei Forster, Hamb. Gartenz. 17: 165. 1861. 



Cereus funkii Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 61. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis pycnacanthus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis zizkaanits Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis panhoplites Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis poselge.ri Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis heteromorphus Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63. 1897. 



Cereus chilensis polygoiuis Schumann, Gesamtb. Kakteen 63, 1897. 



>.: .', i 



FIG. 198. Trichocereus chiloensis. 



FIG. 199. Trichocereus chiloensis. 



* Cereus pepinianus was described by Salm-Dyck in 1845 (Allg. Gartenz. 13: 354. 1845) who there credits the 

 name to Lemaire. Lemaire evidently had reported the name under some other genus, for in 1850 (Salm-Dyck, Cact. 

 Hort. Dyck. 1849. 44, 197) Salm-Dyck redescribed the species, crediting himself with the name and citing " Echinocactus 

 pepinianus Cat. Cels" as synonym. The name Echinocactus pepinianus Lemaire occurs first in 1846 (Forster, Handb. 

 Cact. 347), but without description. Labouret in 1853 takes it up as Echinocactus echinoides pepinianus (Monogr. 

 Cact. 178), with the statement that Salm-Dyck considered it synonymous with Cereus pycnacanthus. These two 

 combinations in Echinocactus, while evidently referring to Cereus pepinianus, being without description, can not be 

 properly referred here as synonyms. They are, however, both referred by Schumann to Echinocactus pepinianus. 

 The plant which he describes, however, is different from Cereus pepinianus. If a good Echinocactus, it should be 

 credited to Schumann, with the citation to his monograph (Gesamtb. Kakteen 420. 1898). 



