NOTES ON CLYDE TENTHREDINID/E (sAWFLIF.s) 137 



Pteronus monticola, Thorns. Recorded by Cameron as rare in 

 Clydesdale (vol. ii., p. 133). Referred by Konow to Pteronus 

 similator, Forst. {Gen. Insectorum, 1905, p. 58) ; and followed by 

 Morice as similator, Forst. = monticola, C. (Ent. Mo. Mag., 

 1906, p. 132). 



Pteronus glottianus, Cam. Larvae recorded by Cameron from Port- 

 Glasgow (1886). By Konow referred to Pteronus fagi, 

 Zaddach (Gen. Insectorum, 1905, p. 55); and followed 

 doubtfully by Morice (Ent. Mo. Mag., June 1906, p. 134). 



Croesus latipes, Vill. Malloch, under Cra/sus varus, Vill., points 

 out that Cameron records the larva of C. latipes, Vill., 

 doubtfully from Clober in 1878. Cameron (vol. ii., p. 40; 

 issued to the Ray Society in the year 1884) gives Clober Wood 

 as a locality for the species. 



Fenella Westwoodi, Cam. Recorded by Cameron, and described 

 (Mon., vol. i., p. 289) rare, Bishopton, on birch. Not taken 

 notice of by Malloch. Konow was inclined to refer this 

 species to the genus Fenusa, teste Morice (Ent. Mo. Mag., 

 1907, p. 249). 



Hoplocampa alpina, Thorns. Was recorded by Cameron as occurring 

 in Clydesdale (vol. i., p. 262), so that Malloch's is not the first 

 record. 



Pseudodineura fuscula, Kl. ( = parvula, Thorns.) Cameron, in his 

 1886 list, altered this to Dineura despecta, KL, and as such it 

 appears in his Mon. (vol. ii., p. 19); see alsj vol. iv., p. 187, 

 and Morice, Ent. Mo. Mag., 1907, p. 248. Malloch takes no 

 notice of Cameron's D. despecta. 



Fenusa albipes, Cam. Konow (Gen. Insectorum, 1905, p. 90) 

 evidently considers this a good species. Taken by Cameron 

 on a rose bush in Cadder on 20th August, and included in his 

 1876 list (Mon., vol. i., p. 298). 



Entodecta pumila, Kl. If Malloch is correct as to the genus, 

 it should read pu mi/us, Kl. It is equal to F. pumilis, Htg. 

 which should read pumiiio, Htg., in the paragraph below 

 which Malloch mentions he cannot place ; and also = Phaznusa 

 pumiiio, Htg., at the end of the list, which he mentions he cannot 

 trace. According to Konow (Gen. Insectoru?n, 1905, p. 85), 

 pumilus, Kl. = pumiiio, Htg.; see also Mon., vol. iv., p. 186. 

 Malloclrs Entodecta pumila, KL, may be a Kaliosphinga, i.e., 

 Kaliosphinga pumila, Kl., as he quotes Cameron's 1876 record 

 for pumila, KL, "common among birch." I have Kaliosphinga 

 pumila, KL, from Luss and Irvine, identified for me by 

 Dr Enslin. 



30 S 



