ON IH! * \l 



We ihlD return to this poii a: 

 the discussion. 



The particular which inferr be 



determine ic causal law, or ma 



in such general terms that marr. t [ 



ght sa* the description, 



whether the constant relation affirm 

 is one which only one term can h. 

 which manv terms mav h 

 the r< question will i 



it has found some more . w 



rminc the inferred things u 

 11 known things arc in t 

 take l ;nt of temporal rclatior 



>al law to 

 httw he thing g the ' 



hear thum: that ther 



that the thing inferred is e:itcr ti 

 O when we ft tiling 



the thur the law sto ti 



n the thing inferre \V:u 

 ^hts from his wo: th.i 



app: 



J law is to ach lion 



must not be conic: vag 



but m. much cucr or h 



i say, the timc-rcla* 

 d the thing inft 



the > be 



g to the length a 

 -val. * in hour ago 



hour h he will be coK Such a i 



>lves two causal , one in( 



something which a quarter f a hour 



