REPORT ON THE RADIOLARIA. 849 



since the spines of the different zones bear apophyses of different shapes. Some- 

 times the four equatorial spines are stouter than the sixteen other spines, and often 

 the eight tropical sjjines are somewhat different in form from the eight polar and 

 from the four equatorial spines. The length of all twenty spines is commonly equal. 

 Their form is usually more or less compressed, two-edged (as in Zygacantha), more 

 rarely cylindrical (as in Acanthometron), or somewhat quadrangular (but not truly 

 prismatic) ; therefore the transverse section of the spines is commonly elliptical or 

 lanceolate, rarely circular or rhombic, never square ; this seems to indicate their origin 

 from Zygacantha. As in all Acantharia, the spines consist of acanthiu, not of silex. 

 Their central ends are either jierfectly grown together, and form a single star of 

 acanthiu, or the triangular faces of their small pyramidal bases are supported one upon 

 another, without true concrescence. 



The apophyses of the radial spines, l)y which the two concentric spherical shells 

 are formed, seem to be constantly four on each spine, two being opposite in each shell. 

 The proximal pair of opposite apophyses, forming the inner or medullary shell, is 

 constantly much smaller than the distal pair composing the outer or cortical shell 

 (PL 133, fig. 5). The proximal pair corresponds probably to the two primary 

 apophyses of the Diporaspida [Pliractaspis, Dorataspis, &c.), whilst the distal pair- 

 corresponds to the free apojihyses of Oropliaspis (PL 133, fig. 6). Therefore the 

 Phractopeltida may h^ derived phylogeuetically from the Diporaspida (not from 

 the Tessaraspida). In the common ancestral genus of this family, Phractopelta, 

 the free part of the radial spines (outside the outer shell) is quite simple, without free 

 apophyses ; in all other genera of the family that free part of the S2iines (either in 

 all twenty spines or only in some of them) bears a third pair of lateral apophyses ; 

 these may be either simple or branched or even latticed ; but the outer apoph3"ses 

 (of the third rank) remain constantly free, and a third lattice-sheU is never formed 

 liy union of their edges (PL 133, figs. 2—4). 



The inner lattice-shell of the Phractopeltida, or their " medullary shell," is con- 

 stantly very small (commonly 0'03 to 0'05 mm. in diameter, rarely more). Its 

 structure is difficult to make out ; in the unbroken shell it is concealed by the dense 

 network of the outer shell ; in the broken shell it is commonly destroyed. Usually 

 the pores of the inner shell are very small, circular or subcircular, scarcely as broad as 

 the small separating bars. In the majority of Phractopeltida their number seems 

 to be about forty, being probably the forty primary aspinal pores of the Dipora- 

 sjjida ; in some species this number seems to be exceeded, so that perhaps some 

 sutural pores may exist between the as^jinal pores ; but commonly the twenty plates 

 composing the inner shell (each with two aspinal pores) seem to grow together 

 perfectly by theu" meeting edges, so that there are no sutural pores between them. 

 Evident sutures were not recognisable in the inner shell of any Phractopeltida. 



(ZOOL. CHALL. EXP. — PART XL. 188.5.) Rr 107 



