REPORT ON THE GASTEROPODA. 235 



Mr Tryon considers Angas' species = Columbella tayloriana, Reeve. His types in the British 

 Museum seemed to me to be = Columbclla lincolnensis, Reeve ; but I should have united that and 

 several others to Columbella acuminata, Menke, which is older. 



6. Columbclla (Mitrella) australis, Gaskoin. 



Colmnbella australis, Gaskoin, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1851, p. 5, No. 7. 



,, ,, Reeve, Conch. Icon., vol. xi. pi. xv. fig. 78. 



Colnmbella (Mitrella) australis, Angas, South Austral. Moll., Proc. Zool. Soc. Loud., 1865, p. 166, No. 60. 



,, ,, „ Angas, Port Jackson Moll., Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1867, p. 194, 



No. 50. 



,, ,, ,, Tryon, Manual, vol. v. p. 126, pi. xlix. figs. 97, 98. 



April 17-18, 1874. Port Jackson, Sydney. 2 to 10 fathoms. 

 April 23, 1874. Port Jackson, Sydney. 6 to 15 fathoms. 



Habitat. — Sydney (Gaskoin), and Yorke's Peninsula, South Australia (Angas). 



7. Columbclla (Atilia) Jilosa, Angas. 



sEsopus filosus, Angas, Port Jackson Moll., Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1867, p. Ill, pi. xiii, fig. 6, and 



p. 195, No. 56. 

 Columbella (Atilia) filosa, Tryon, Manual, vol. v. p. 151, pi. liii. fig. 17. 



April 17-18, 1874. Port Jackson, Sydney. 2 to 10 fathoms. 

 Habitat. — Port Jackson, Sydney (Angas). 



8. Columbella (Atilia) puella, Sowerby. 



Colmnbella puella, Sowerby MS., British Museum. 



„ „ Reeve, Conch. Icon., vol. xi. pL xiii. fig. 65. 



„ „ Deshayes, Moll. Reunion, p. 131. 



,, (Atilia) puella, E. A. Smith, Mar. Shells, "Andaman Islands, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 



1878, p. 807, No. 12. 

 ,, puella, v. Martens, Moll. Mauritius, &c, p. 248. 

 ,, (Atilia) conspersa, Tryon, Manual, vol. v. p. 145, pi. lii. fig. 79. 



April 17, 1874. Port Jackson, Sydney. 2 to 10 fathoms. 



Habitat. — Philippine Islands (Reeve), Mauritius, Ceylon, Nicobars, Malayan Archi- 

 pelago (v. Martens), Reunion (Deshayes), Andamans (E. A. Smith). 



This is a young specimen of the species, and had been overlooked by me. Mr E. A. Smith 

 kindly identified it for me. Both Deshayes and v. Martens quote the species as from the Thesaurus 

 of Sowerby, but it is not given there, and their references do not tally with one another, so that 

 there is evidently some confusion. 



