1126 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. 



Suborder III. CYETOIDEA, Haeckel, 1862. 



Cijrtkla, Haeckel, 1862, Monogr. d. Radiol., pp. 272, 280. 

 Cijrtoidea vel Cyrtida, Haeckel, 1881, Prodromus, pp. 425-439. 

 Polycystina solitaria, Ehrenberg, 1847, Monatsber. d. k. preuss. Akad. d. 



Wiss. Berlin, pp. 53, 54. 

 Monodictya nassellaria, Ehrenberg, 1875, Abhandl. d. k. preuss. Akad. d. 



Wiss. Berlin, pp. 156, 157. 



Definition. — Nassellaria with a complete lattice-shell, exhibiting a simple or 

 reduced cephalis, which is neither bilocular nor lobate, without sagittal constriction. 



The order Cyrtoidea, described by me in 1862 as the family Cyrtida, is by far 

 the largest of all the main groups of Eadiolaria, and remarkable from the extraordinary 

 variety of forms and the number of species. In the following system more than eleven 

 hundred species are described, comprising about one-fourth of the number of species 

 in the whole class of Radiolaria. This astonishing variety, however, is not effected 

 by development of a large number of different types, but by an extraordinary 

 variability within certain restricted boundaries, similar to what is seen among 

 insects and birds. The number of genera, therefore, is comparatively small, and they 

 may all be disposed into four families only, which in my Monograph (1862, p. 280) 

 were distinguished as Monocyrtida, Dicyrtida, Tricyrtida and Stichocyrtida. If we 

 divide these four groups in the following pages into twelve families and twenty- 

 four subftimilies, we are guided by practical considerations only, hoping thereby to 

 give a better survey of the difficult labyrinth of Cyrtoidean morphology. 



The Cyrtoidea are characterised by this wonderful richness of specific forms not 

 only in the present seas, but also for millions of years in the former ages of our globe. 

 The majority of all the fossil Radiolaria which are now known belong to this group, and 

 many species of it are so common, that great rocks are formed b}^ their union. This 

 fact was first observed by Ehrenberg, who in his first system of Polycystina (1847, 

 loc. cit., p. 54) enumerated forty -four genera and two hundred and eighty -two species; 

 the Cyrtoidea, his Polycystina solitaria, form the preponderant majority of the 

 whole class, viz., twenty -five genera and one hundred and ninety-three species. 



In this first system (of 1847), as well as in the last systematic table of Ehrenberg 

 (of 1875, loc. cit.), the Cyrtida as "Polycystina solitaria" are opposed to all other 

 Radiolaria, as " Polycystina composita." The former bear the definition " Testae 

 silicese spatio interno ample pervio, aut passim levius transverse constricto " ; the latter, 

 however, " Testse silicese spatio interno cellulose aut strictura longitudinali constricto." 

 In reality these definitions are insufficient, and the conclusions which Ehrenberg derived 



