938 THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. 



consists of a simple ring only, surrounding the central capsule, and armed commonly 

 with simj)le thorns or with larger branched spines. The branches of these spines are 

 constantly free, never joining together. Therefore the shell exhibits no trace of 

 fenestration or lattice-work, no pores or gates, except the simple large gate of the ring 

 itself. In all other S t e p h o i d e a we find secondary gates or lattice-work. 



The first known form of this family is Litliocircvs annularis, described by Johannes 

 Miiller in 1858 (Abhandl. d. k. Akad. d. Wiss. Berlin, p. 29, Taf. i. fig. 1). He 

 observed already the central capsule (" Blase ") surrounded by the circular ring of 

 silex, and the calymma (" Strahlige Gallert ") enveloping the whole body. The peculiar 

 structure of the soft body, particularly the " area porosa " on the basal pole of the 

 central capsule, and the pseudopodial cone within it, were first accurately described by 

 Hertwig (in 1879). A great number of simple rings, similar to these, were found in 

 the Challenger collection, and are here arranged in six genera and forty-eight species. 



The simjDle ring of silex, which alone forms the skeleton of the Stephanida, 

 corresponds to the primary or sagittal ring of the other Stephoidea, and lies there- 

 fore vertically in the median or sagittal plane of the body. We can therefore 

 distinguish on it four diff'erent segments, rods or bows, two of which are more horizontal, 

 two more vertical. The former are one upper bow or apical rod, and one lower bow or 

 basal rod. The latter are one posterior bow or dorsal rod, and one anterior bow or 

 ventral rod. Sometimes each of these four component bows is distinguished by a 

 corner-spine, or by a pair of divergent branches. 



In the two simplest (and probably oldest) genera of Stephanida, in Archicircus and 

 Lithocrrcus, the dorsal and ventral rods of the ring are equal and cannot be 

 distinguished ; therefore the fundamental form is here amphithect, diphragmatic, or 

 biradial (the poles of the sagittal axis being equal). In the four other genera the 

 dorsal rod is more straight (often vertical) and more or less difi"erent from the ventral, 

 convexly curved rod ; therefore the fundamental form is here dipleuric or bilateral, as 

 in the greater number of all Nassellaria (the poles of the sagittal axis being unequal).. 

 The general form of the ring in this latter case is commonly obliquely ovate or 

 nearly triangular, the basal pole being more pointed, the apical pole more rounded 

 (PL 81). 



The rods or bows of the ring are either roundish or cylindrical (with circular or 

 elliptical transverse section), or they are prismatic or angular (commonly with 

 triangular transverse section). In the latter case one edge usually is prominent in the 

 sagittal plane (on the convex outside of the ring), whilst two other edges diverge 

 laterally on both sides of it. The inner or concave margin of the ring is commonly 

 smooth. 



The inner perimeter of the large gate, enclosed by the ring, is commonly rounded 

 (elliptical or ovate), rarely angular. However, the outer perimeter of the ring is 



