964 JOURNAL, BOMBAY NATURAL HLST. SOCIETY, Vol. XXVI. 



Type locality : — Palanpiir. (B. N. 

 H. S. — Crump). 



Other localities : — Palanpiir (M.S. I.). 



Type :— B. M. No. 13. 8. 23. 4. 



Type locality :—B.aYnna,ga.r, Ku- 

 maon (B. N. H. S. — Crump). 



Other localities : — Kumaon (M.S.I.) 



Type:—B. M. No. 14. 12. 1. 2. 



Type locality : — Chaibassa, Orissa. 

 (B. N. H. S.— Crump). 



Other localities : — Orissa (M. S. I.). 



Tijpe:—B. M. No. 15. 4. 3. 108, 



Gen. XVI.— H^ROMYS. 



This genus was separated from Mus, by Thomas, to provide for 

 certain Bornean forms. 



No. 281. chiropus, Thos. The name chiropus is based on a 



single specimen taken by Fea. As the 

 description given of it by Thomas seems to agree in many ways 

 with the characters ascribed to H^romys I have placed it tenta- 

 tively in that genus. 



Distribution : — 



H. chiropus, Thomas. Type locality : — Karennee (Fea), 



Other localities : — None. 

 Type : — Mus. Civ. Genoa. 



Gen. XVII. — Hadromys. 



The genus was founded by Thomas (J. B. N. H. S. xx, p. 999, 

 1911) to accommodate a mouse, humei, from Manipur described bv 

 himself in 1886 (P. Z. S., p. 63). 



No. 293. humei, Thos. The genotype and only species. 



Distribution : — 



H. humei, T^homskS. Type locality : — Moirang, Manipu:. 



(Hume). 



Other localities : — (None). 



Type :— B. M. No. 85. 8. 1. 318. 



Gen. XVIII. — Golunda. 



Blanford lumps this genus with the African Pelomys, but their 

 separation is now quite generally recognised. 



No. 299. ellioti. Gray, Kelaart gave two names in Ceylon 



but I have been able to retain ovly 

 one of them, mz : — newera (J, B. N. H. S., xxiv, p. 94,1915). 



