rRACA. i\ 



d bj this feature ThemaleofP macronyx differs besides from the same 

 -. uppei margin ol pseudorostrum, no dorsal spines on the 

 cles of the uropods. 

 • he "Ingoli at a single stati( 

 Iceland Stat. io Lai 64 24' N.. Long 28 50 \\\. 788 fath . tem] 1 mutilated male 



I by the "Thor" in [904 at the following locality 

 ith-WesI "i the Faeroes Lai 6i 15 X.. Long. 9 35' W . 463 -515 fath.; 1 male itype). 



Campylaspis G. o. Sars. 



• his large genus about 24 species have been described in the literature, and representatives are 

 known from nearly every sea. In the "Ingolf" ana ro species have been captured, but 5 among them are new. 

 which indirectly indicate- that even the European fauna of this genus is still somewhat imperfectly known 1 . 

 Among the cephalothoric appendages especially second and third pairs of maxillipcds and first and 

 ad pair- ni legs H. generally recognized as affording specific characters. According to my experience 

 third maxillipeds differ more from species to species than any of the three other pairs, and ought therefore 

 always to be carefully figured, especially merus. carpus and propodus show excellent characters. It may be 

 mentioned here that the merus shows a gradual development from a normal shape, f. inst. in C . intermedia 

 PI. III. figs. 6e — 6 f) to thai found in C. verrucosa (fig. s a), from this again to the allied deep-sea form C. 

 gloh, ■ 1 .m the Davis Strait, where the shape of the merus is rather curious, while in the close- 



ly allied antarctic species I frigida H. J H (in Res. Voy. Belgica, iqoN) the merus has been developed in 

 the ■ traordinary way in the same direction, so that its shape in C. globosa is intermediate between those 



sa and in C. frigida; all these 3 (or 4) species arc allied and somewhat similar in aspect, and we 

 have here an interesting connection between a boreal form, a deep-sea form from a sea with its coasts sub- 

 ic or arctic and a real antarctic species — but no bipolarity of a species 



Finally it may be mentioned that the colour of the species in some forms does not agree well with 

 Sars' statements; variation or difference is mentioned later on at C. rubicunda, C. undata and C. horrida. 



[i. Campylaspis rubicunda Liljeb. 



l'l III. fig. 1 a.) 



uma tbicunda Lilljeborg, Ofv K. Sv. Vet.-Akad. Forh. Bd C2, p 121. 



1-. Kg] Sv. Vet.-Akad. Handl. Ny Foljd, Bd. n. no 6, p r.o, Tav. 



IV. Fig. 14 — 16. 



OStata 1. O. S. have not been found in the [ngoli .irr.i but ,i> both have 

 been - . 1 ,' N l.on- r i , I -, t.iili .end the last-named i'orm besides 



• of the Hebrides at o' N I."' '' • I all . it may be possible thai thej can be found west or ^mitli 



• 



