Neue Litteratur. 89 



Brotherus, V. F. 1902. Polytrichaceae, Dawsoniaceae, Pleurocarpi, Erpo- 

 podiaceae, Hedvvigiaceae, Hedwigieae, Cleistostomeae und Rhaco- 

 carpeae. (Natürl. Pflanzenfamilien. Lfrg. 222. p. 673—720. III.) 



Cardot, J. 1905. Nouvelle contribution ä la flore bryologique des iles 

 atlantiques. (Bull. Herb. Boiss. Ser. 2. T. V. No. 3. p. 201—215. 

 pl. I et II.) 



Cardot, J. and S. Theriot. 1905. New or unrecorded Mosses of North 

 America (Bryologist. Vol. VIII. No. 2. p. 36.) 



Farmar, L. 1905. Monoclea Forsteri. (Knowledge and Sei. News. Vol. II. 

 No. 4. p. 78. With fig.) 



Friren, A. 1904. Promenades bryologiques en Lorraine. III. (Bull. Soc. 

 Hist. Nat. Metz. 1904. 25 pp.) 



Hagen, J. 1904. Musci Norvegiae borealis. Bericht über die im nörd- 

 lichen Norwegen von Arnell, Fridtz, Kaalaas u.a. 1S86— 1897 

 gesammelten Laubmoose. Theil 3. (Mus. Aarsh. Tromsö. 1904. p. 1 

 — 24 und p. 241—382. Mit 2 Tai) 



Haynes, C. C. 1905. Notes on a colony of Hepatics associated on a 

 Fungus. (Bryologist. Vol. VIII. No. 2. p. 31—32.) 



Herzog, Th. 1905. Die Laubmoose Badens. (Bull. Herb. Boiss. Ser. 2, 

 T. V. No. 3. p. 268-283.). [Forts, folgt.] 



Holzinger, J M. 1904. Musci acrocarpi Boreali-Americani. Fase. 1—4. 

 (Winona 1904. 8". With 100 dried spec ) 



Holzinger, J. M. 1905. Some recently described N. A. Polytricha. (Bryo- 

 logist. Vol. VIII. No. 2. p. 29-31.) 



Lillie, D. 1905. Hepatics of Caithness. (Journ. of Bot. Vol. XLIII. 

 No 508. p. 124—127.) 



Macvicar, S. M. 1905. New and rare British Hepaticae. (Journ. of Bot. 

 Vol. XLIII. No. 508. p. 117—120.) 



Matouschek, F. 1905. Additamenta ad Floram bryologicam Istriae et Dal- 

 matiae. (Mag. Bot. Lap. Jg. IV. No. 1/3. p. 24—27.) 



Maynard, C. J. 1905. Methods in Moss Study. (Boston 1905. 16°. 120 pp. 

 With colored plates ) 



Mönkemeyer, W. 1905. Beiträge zur Moosflora des Erzgebirges. (Hed- 

 wigia. Bd. XLIV. H. 3. p. 181 — 192) 



Watts, W. W. 1905. Some Melbourne Mosses. (Victorian Naturalist. 

 Vol. XXI. No. 10. p. 140-142.) 



XIV. Pteridophyten. 



Baiky, C. 1905. The British horsetails. (Proc. Manchester Field Club. 



Vol. I. Pt. IL p. 316—321.) 

 Christ, H. 1905. Filices Cadierianae. (journ. de Bot. Ann. 19. No. 3. 



p. 58 — 68. ä suivre.) 

 Christ H. 1905. Primitiae florae Costaricensis. Filices et Lycopodiaceae. 



(fin) (Bull. Herb. Boiss. Ser. 2. T. V. No. 3. p. 248—260.) 

 Diels, L. 1905. Die primitivste Form von Lygodium. (Hedwigia. XLIV. 



H. 3. p. 133-136. Mit 1 Textfig.) 

 Gufiroy, Ch. 1905. Les Aspidium aculeatum et A. Lonchitis constituent- 



ils deux especes distinetes? (Bull. Soc. Bot. France. LH. 2. p. 77 



—84- ! P 1 -) ^ • u 



Zeiller, R. 1905. Sur la decouverte de stations nouvelles du Tncho- 



manes radicans dans les Basses-Pyrenees. (Bull. Soc. Bot. France. 

 LH. 2. p. 65—67.) 



XV. Floristik, Geographie, Horticultur und Systematik 

 der Phanerogamen. 



Cf. I. Coville and Mac Dougal; III. Berger, die Brutknospen; XIX. Jackson. 

 Ainsworth Brode, T. 1905. Happy hunting-grounds for nature-students. 



(Nature Study. Vol. XIV. No. 153. p. 51—54. With 1 pl.) 

 Amelung, H. 1905. Wie ist der Gemüsebau in der Umgegend Berlins für 



Liebhaber am rationellsten zu betreiben? (Gekrönte Preisschrift. 



Berlin 1905. Selbstverlag des Ver. Beförd. Gartenbau i. d. preuss. 



Staaten. 8°. 20 pp.) 



