2 2 1 



Table A. 



Proportion between length of telson and that of the posterior margin . . . 

 Proportion between the greatest width and that of the posterior margin . 

 Proportion between length of telson and the distance of the anterior pair of 



spinules from the posterior margin 



Proportion between the distances of the two pairs of spinules from the 



posterior margin 



N° i male from Stat. 49 a ; X" 2 male from Stat. 51 ; N" 3 male from Banda; N° 4 male 

 from Stat. 279. 



Table B. 



Length of small chela 



Height of the palm 



Proportion between length and height 



Length of the fingers 



Proportion between length of chela and that of the fingers 

 Proportion between length and height of the palm . 



N° 1 male from Stat. 49 a ; N° 2 adult female from Stat. 5 1 ; N° 3 male from Banda. 



Table C , 



indicating the proportion between the length of the meri, carpi and propodi of the 3 rd and 

 4 ,h legs. 



NO 1. NO 2. NO 3. 

 Merus \ ( 3 



Carpus > .of y& legs < 1 

 Propodus ) ! 2,6 



Merus \ j 2,5 



Carpus > of 4 th legs j I 

 Propodus ) 



Table D. 



Length of merus 



Width of merus 



Proportion between length and width of merus . 

 Length of carpus from articulation to articulation. . 



Width of carpus 



Proportion between length and width of carpus . . . . 



Length of propodus 



Width of propodus 



Proportion between length and width of propodus . 



Length of dactylus 



89 



Sir.OGA- EXPEDITIE XXXIX fl '. 



of the third legs 



NO 3. 

 2,12 



0,525 



4 

 0,74 



o,33 

 2,24 

 1,82 

 0,29 



6,3 

 0,46 



29 



