ANNELIDS. I. Y) 



in the not elytron-carrying feet as in the elytron-carrying. Dorsal as well as ventral sette are present, 

 but they are all in rather had condition, so that it is very difficult to state how their apices are shaped; 

 there are a lot of those with bifid tip, which are figured b\ Me. In tush, but 1 am inclined to con- 

 sider them as originated h\ fracture and not as intact setae. I have found a few of those figured by 

 Khiers 1. c. T. II, figs. 3, 4 and 5. 



Enipo Torelli (Malmgren). 



1865. Nemidia Torelli, Malmgren: Nord. Hafs-Ann. p. 84. 

 [883. Enipo Torelli, Levinsen: Nord. Ann. p. 39. 



Locality : 



Brede-fjord, West-Greenland, ro— 15111. gravel and clay. 



, 310—320 - clay with stoms. 



I follow Levinsen in uniting in one genus the two rather isolated forms Enipo Kinbergi and 

 Nemidia Torelli, Malmgren. While Enipo Kinbergi seems to be a boreal form, not scarce in Danish 

 Seas, Enipo Torelli is a pronounced arctic species. The two specimens from Brede-fjord in the southern 

 part of West-Greenland, which I have had under examination are both typical and agree well with 

 the description of Malmgren. 



Macellicephala violacea (Lev.). 



1887. Oligolepis violacea, Levinsen: Kara-Havets Ledorme, p. 4. 



1907. Macellicephala violacea, Wireu: Zool. Studier tillagnade Prof. Tullberg p. 287. 



Locality : 



The Ingolf-Exped. has taken the species on two localities: 

 St. 103. 66XV N. L. 8 5 2' W. L 579 fms. N. O. of Iceland. 

 - 116. 70°05' 8°26' 371 S. of Jan Maveu. 



Further is present one specimen from the neighbourhood of Ingolf's Station 116, namely: 70°32' 

 N. L. 8°io' W. L. 470 fms. and two from S. W. of the Faroe Islands: 6i°07' N. L. q°y)' W. L. 835 in. and 

 6i°8' N. L. 9°28' W. L. 820 m. 



The specimens from the two last-mentioned stations are remarkably smaller than those from 

 the other localities, and it is possible that the specimens in question belong to another species. Already 

 several species of this interesting genus have been described, latest by Fauvel in his valuable paper 

 on the collections of the prince of Monaco, 1914. What, however, renders difficult, not to say impossible, 

 a closer examination is the state of preservation of the specimens, especially the fact that they haw- 

 lost all their bristles, a case which, according to Wiren, is not uncommon in M. violacea. Consequently, 

 for the moment, I refer all the specimens present to this species. 



