BURSERACEAE 207 
the ‘Philippines, but is of local occurrence and is not abundant; 
it is almost universally known as manungal. 
BURSERACEAE 
CANARIUM Linnaeus 
)» Canarium commune Blanco Fl. Filip. (1837) 791, non Linn.=Canarium 
; pimela Blanco op. cit. ed. 2 (1845) 545; ed. 3, 3 (1879) 201, t. 348, 
non Koen.=CANARIUM VILLOSUM (Miq.) F.-Vill. (Canariopsis 
villosa Miq., Canarium cumingu Engl.). 
This species is very common and widely distributed in the 
Philippines and the only one of the genus growing naturally in 
the. immediate vicinity of Manila. The leaves are -pubescent 
when young, but usually become entirely glabrous in age. To 
be critically compared with this species and for the most part 
probably to be reduced to it are Canariwm luxurians Engl. var. 
monstrosum Engl. (abnormal form of inflorescence due to fun- 
gus or to insect attack), C. cwmingit Engl., C. thyrsoideum Perk., 
C. stachyanthum Perk., and C. connarifolium Perk. 
Illustrative specimen from Antipolo, Rizal Province, Luzon, 
October, 1913 (Merrill: Species Blancoanae No. 558). 
Canarium album Blanco Fl. Filip. (1837) 793; ed. 2 (1845) 546; ed. 3, 3 
(1879) 201, non Raeusch=CANARIUM LUZONICUM (Blume) A. 
. Gray (C. carapifolium Perk.). 
This was reduced by Fernandez-Villar, through error, to Cana- 
rium commune Linn., a species that is unknown from the Phil- 
ippines except for a single tree in cultivation in Mindanao. 
Canarium luzonicum A. Gray is based on Pimela luzonica Blume, 
which in turn is merely a new name for Canarium album Blanco. 
The species is widely distributed in the Philippines. 
Tlustrative specimen from San Mateo, Rizal Province, Luzon, 
January, 1915 (Merrill: Species Blancoanae No. 713). 
aa CANARIUM MULTIPINNATUM Llanos Frag. Pl. Filip. (1851) 107 (sp. 
nov.) ; F.-Villar & Naves in Blanco FI. Filip. ed. 3, 4* (1880) 87. 
This species was retained by Fernandez-Villar, Novis. App. 
— (1880) 40, as a distinct one, and there is very little doubt but 
that it is identical with Canarium radlkoferi Perk. Frag. FI. 
Philip. (1904) 96 in spite of the fact that Llanos’s description 
is not in entire agreement with this species. Perkins’s species 
is the only Philippine Canariwm known to me that at all agrees 
with Llanos’s description in any considerable number of charac- 
ters and is common in central Luzon. The stipules, however, 
are linear, not foliaceous, the calyx is 3-merous, not 5-merous, | 
and there are no bracts. The vegetative and fruit characters 
