Limiaan Society. 28^ 



cumstances, often giving rise to a difficulty in arriving at a decided 

 opinion in questions connected with cellulose, when using the 

 sulphuric acid and iodine test. Many phaenomena might be cited in 

 reference to this subject, but the main point to which he wishes to 

 direct attention is, the doubt existing in his mind as to the nature 

 of the red spot described by Ehrenberg as an ' eye ' in the Infusoria. 

 He has observed this object chiefly in the unicellular AI(/(e and 

 zoospores, and was first led to suspect that the red colour depended 

 on unequal refraction, in the cells of Chlamydomonas Pulvisculus. In 

 these he has frequently found several red spots on one individual 

 cell, which however could not all be brought into focus at once, and 

 he has decidedly observed, that when these spots were brought into 

 clear and well-defined focus, they appeared as bright colourless r 

 granules. Frequently no red s})ot at all could be found. 



The idea suggested by this was further confirmed by noticing 

 the similar variations of colour according to form in a granule 

 (nucleolus }), in a half- decomposed, colourless, diseased cell. .,..,,, |,r[ 



Finally, he had recently found that he could bring out the crio^fiQQt 

 colour most beautifully in the central spot or ' hilum ' of starch 

 granules. When the lens is a little too far away from the object, 

 the hilum appears like a minute black spot ; then, carrying the lens a 

 little nearer, it comes out as a beautiful crimson spot exactly like an 

 * eye- spot ' in every respect. Adjusting the focus exactly, by bringing 

 down the lens a little more, the hilum is seen as a well-defined spot 

 of a brighter character than the rest of the starch-grain, but altogether 

 devoid of any prismatic colour. 



Although dwelling but briefly on this question here,, Mr. Henfrey 

 states that he has had it under consideration for some time, and he 

 thinks it desirable to make known his supposition now, in order that 

 other microscopists working with different lenses may direct their 

 attention to the point, and furnish the results obtained with them, 

 since almost all high objectives diff'er slightly in their correction. 



Read further, " Notes on the Natural Order Crescentiacea.** By 

 Berthold Seemann, Esq., Ph.D., F.L.S. &c. .„.r. f^,.^j| 



The author cites first the opinions in relation to the proper posi- 

 tion of the genus Crescentia and its allies in the natural system 

 successively entertained by De Jussieu, Endlicher and DeCandolle, 

 the latter of whom associated them with Bignoniacea. Gardner first 

 pointed out their claims to be regarded as a distinct natural order 

 allied to the family last named, and Prof. Lindley adopted this view 

 and first gave a diagnosis of the order, taken however only from a 

 single species, Crescentia Cujete, L., for which reason Dn Seemann 

 proposes the following amended character. iruio laom 83?n9l- 



CRESCENTIACEiE. '" *'' ^-^^'^qivq 



Frutices vel arbores, glabvre v. glabratae ; caule ramisque plils irifhifli^dVt( 

 anguhitis. Folia alterna, fasciculata, v. opposita, petiolata v. subsessilia, 

 nunc simplicia, Fac^pissime intcgerrima, nunc composita, 3-foHolata, v. 

 pari- V. iinpari-piniiata. Stipulce nnllne, v. interdum e genuine axillaris 

 Ibliis primariis spuria?. Floras hcrmapliroditi; subrcgulnrcs, v. irregu- 

 lares, terminales v. axiilaves, v. saepiasinie ex trunco aut basi ramulorum 



