86 PROFESSOR LINDLET'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO 



214. S. Wightianum, Lindl. I.e.; Wight, Ic. t. 917. (Aerides radi- 

 cosum, A. Rich, in Ann. Sc. 2 ser. xv. p. 65, 1. 1. fig. C. 



Courtallum, Wight (90/) ; Nilgherries, Perrottet {75 Herb. Mus. Par.) ; 

 Khasija, T. Lobb. 



Like the last, except in the circumstances already mentioned. 

 In my specimen the lip has sharp lateral triangular lobes, and a 

 middle one acute, rather fleshy towards the base, but thin and 

 slightly crenulate above the middle. A. Bichard's plant, which 

 came from the neighbourhood of Ootacamund, is certainly to be 

 referred here. 



215. S. DISTICH UM; caulibus elongatis fihformibus, foUis lanceolatis 

 setaceo-acuminatis distichis, pedunculis paucifloris terminalibus et 

 axillaribus, sepalis petahsque oblongis carnosissimis, labello calceolari 

 lobo medio semicirculari membranaceo acute disco didymo carnoso. 



Sikkim, 6000-8000 feet, J. D. H. (206) ; Khasija, 5000-6000 feet. Id. 

 (83). 



A very peculiar species, probably most nearly allied to S. acu- 

 tifolium, and remarkable for its long weak stems and fleshy 

 distichous leaves about an inch long. The middle lobe of the lip 

 is not exterior to the two others, and it has a remarkable glandular 

 convex double disk. 



216. S. ringens, Lindl. I.e., is S. rubrum, Wight, Ic. t.l673, a good 

 figure, but not the plant of the Genera and Species Orch. 



217. S. viRiDiFLORUM; acaule, foHis (2) oblongis planis obtusis cmar- 

 ginatls, pedunculo laterali bivaginato paucifloro foliis multo breviore, 

 sepalis petalisque unguiculatis obtusis, labello ovali nudo ealcare in- 

 fundibulari incurvo sequali. Micropera viridiflora, Balzell, in Hooker's 

 Journal, iii. 282. 



Western India, Dalzell, in hb. Hooker. 



Very near (Eceoclades pusilla, but with much shorter spikes, 

 and fleshy, not membranous, flowers. This (E. pusilla, with 

 flexuosa, panieulata (Sacc. ^arvulum, m.), and perhaps tenera, are 

 Saccolabia, while others are certainly Angrceca ; and it is probable 

 that (E. maculata is the only plant to which the generic name 

 wiU attach. 



Note. — The Barcanihus roseus, Wight, Ic. 1685, and Jiliformis, 

 Ic. 1684, are certainly species of this genus, and perhaps not 

 distinct from each other. I have seen no specimens. 



Saceolahiitm papillosimi of the same author, Ic. 1672, is not 

 Acampe pajpillosa, nor do I recognize it. 



PoDOcniLus, Blvme. 



218. P. densiflorus, Bl, Rumphia, iv. p. 43. 

 Borneo, T. Lobb. 



