100 MR. COUCH ON THE OCCURRENCE 



Plate IV. 

 Fig. 1. Colsa costcestriga, p. 96 ; la, the head and rostrum seen in front ; 



15, the same seen sideways. 

 Fig. 2. Bidis notivena, p. 88 ; 2a, the head and rostrum seen in front ; 25, the 



same seen sideways. 

 Fig. 3. Conna guttifera, p. 90 ; 3a, the head and rostrum seen in front 



35, the same seen sideways. 

 Fig. 4. Flica latipennis, p. 86 ; 4a, the head and rostrum seen in front 



45, the same seen sideways. 

 Fig. 5. Daradax fusipennis, p. 86 ; 5a, the head and rostrum seen in front 



55, the same seen sideways ; 5c, the extremity of the abdomen seen 



Fig. 6. Ewria Itvrida, p. 88 ; 6a, the head and rostrum seen in front ; 65, the 

 same seen sideways j 6e, the extremity of the abdomen seen sideways. 



On the Occurrence of Sepia hiserialis in Cornwall. 

 By Jonathan Couch, Esq., E.L.S. &c 



[Read March 4th, 1856.] 



It appears from the " History of British Mollusca," by Professor 

 E. Eorbes and Mr. Hanley (vol. iv. p. 241, and PL P.P.P.), that 

 the Sepia hiserialis is regarded as of very rare occurrence in 

 Britain ; one specimen only of its shell or plate having been found 

 in England and three in Ireland. The English specimen was ob- 

 tained on the shore of the county of Northumberland. It may 

 therefore be regarded as of some importance in the completion of 

 our local fauna, to make the Linnean Society acquainted with 

 the fact, that in the course of two days in the month of February 

 of the present year I have myself found no less than ten speci- 

 mens of the dorsal plate or shell of this animal, scattered among 

 perhaps a hundred of those of the Common Bone or Burn Cuttle, 

 Sepia officinalis. 



My attention was attracted to these specimens by the beautiful 

 pale pink colour of the dorsal aspect of the shell; and a very 

 slight examination of the most perfect specimen I could find, com- 

 pared with those of the common species, was sufficient to point 

 out the decided distinction there is between them; but as the 

 shell of this species is but little known, and those which have 

 fallen into my hands are slightly different from what is described 

 in the work above referred to, I beg leave to lay before the 

 Society a more particular description than might otherwise be 

 necessary. 



The length of this shell, as described by Professor Eorbes, was 



