Mr. J. Ralfs on the British Desmidicse. 391 



Vesicle of Thoa murkafa. Fig. 7. Idea of the structure of this form of ve- 

 sicle, which is derived from the shortening of the axis and the whorling and 

 transformation of the cells. 



III. Vesicles of the third order. Fig. 8. Vesicle and branch of Sertularia 

 rosacea. Fig. 9. Vesicle of a Sertularia, in which an internal framework 

 and axis are seen after the exclusion of the ova. 



IV. Vesicles of the fourth order. Fig. 10. A Sertularia, in which the se- 

 condary branches are grouped in pairs ; in this specimen two of the branches 

 are converted into vesicles, but retain their original position and relation to 

 their twin branches. Fig. 11. Vesicle of a Sertularia belonging to this order, 

 exhibiting longitudinal dehiscence. 



V. Vesicles of the fifth order. Fig. 12. Vesicle, and fig. 13, part of the 

 branch of Thoa Beanii. 



VI. Vesicle of the sixth order. Fig. 14. Vesicle and polype-cell of a 

 Laomedea. 



XLVIII. — On the British Desmidiese. By John Ralfs, Esq., 

 M.R.C.S., Penzance*. 



[With a Plate.] 

 Cosmarium, Corda. 



Fronds simple, constricted in the middle ; segments as broad as 

 or broader than long, neither sinuated nor notched. 



The fronds are very minute, simple, constricted in the middle ,• 

 the segments are generally broader than long and inflato-com- 

 pressed, are neither emarginate at the end nor lobed at the sides, 

 and have no spines or processes. One species only is longitudi- 

 nally inflated down the middle, and therefore appears lobed in 

 the end view. In the rest this view is most frequently elliptic ; 

 in some species however it is circular. 



Ehrenberg united plants belonging to this genus with others 

 having lobed segments in order to form his genus Euastrum. 

 Meneghini for the most part followed this arrangement, merely 

 changing the name to Cosmarium, as having the prior claim, and 

 also adding some species taken from Xanthidium. Under Mi- 

 crasterias, Euastrum, and Xanthidium I have given my reasons 

 for differing from such high authorities, and also pointed out the 

 characters which distinguish those genera from Cosmarium, . 



Both Ehrenberg and Meneghini consider the inflato-com- 

 pressed segments essential, but some species (presently to be de- 

 scribed) with globular or cylindrical segments can by no means 

 be separated from the compressed ones. Those having cylindrical 

 fronds in some respects show an affinity with Closterium, and 

 perhaps Closterium Cylindrus would be more suitably united 

 with them. In Cosmarium the fronds are never elongated nor 

 curved, and are always constricted in the middle, and the repro- 

 ductive granules are scattered. 



* Read before the Botanical Society of Edinburgh, June 13th, 1844. 



