OF WASHINGTON. 199 



Gelechia agrimoniella Clemens. 



One type. Clemens' No. 68 ; alar exp., 13 mm. 



This is like the present conception of the species* and belongs 

 in the genus Anacampsis Curtis. Specimens compared with the 

 type are in the U. S. National Museum. 



Gelechia flavocostella Clemens. 



One type, palpi and left wings missing. Clemens' No. 69 ; 

 alar exp., 19 mm. 



As determined by Clemens subsequently, this species belongs 

 to his genus Trichotaphe, and the type confirms the present con 

 ception of the species. f Specimens compared with the type are 

 in the U. S. National Museum. 



Gelechia roseosuffusella Clemens. 



Two types in good condition, Clemens' No. 70 ; alar exp., 10.5 

 mm. 



In spite of the additional evidence of these types, there is still, 

 as I have shown, \ some uncertainty about the identity of this 

 species. The food plant, according to Clemens, is sumach. 

 The species belongs to the genus Aristotclia Hiibner. 



Gelechia rhoifructella Clemens. 



One type, lacking the right wings, Clemens' No. 71 ; alar exp., 

 18 mm. This agrees with my conception of the species ; it be 

 longs in the genus Anacampsis Curtis. 



For references and synonymy of the Gelechiid species, see my 

 Revision of American Gelechiidae. 



Gelechia rubidella Clemens. 



One type, 9, right wings missing, Clemens' No. 72 ; alar exp., 

 ii mm. 



This type confirms the present conception of the species, and 

 it belongs in the genus Aristotelia Hiibner. Compared speci 

 mens are in the U. S. National Museum. 



Gelechia flexurella Clemens. 



Of this species, Clemens' Nos. 94 and 95 according to his list, 

 there is unfortunately no type. The species is at present unrec 

 ognized and of uncertain generic position. 



Gelechia mimella Clemens. 



Clemens' No. 96. Exactly the same conditions exist as with 

 the foregoing species. 



*Busck, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., xxv, p. 850, 1902. 

 t Busck, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., xxv, p. 908, 1902. 

 J Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., xxv, p. 796, 1902. 

 Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., xxv, p. 845, et seq., 1902. 



