204 ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 



The writer's determination* is substantiated, as far as can be, 

 from the type. The species should be known as Epithectis sub- 

 siniella Clemens. 



Depressaria lecontella Clemens. 



One good type, though the left wings are absent, Clemens' No. 

 99 ; alar exp., 24 mm. 



This agrees with my conception. f Specimens, compared with 

 the type, are in the U. S. National Museum. 



Lithocolletis fitchella Clemens. 



One type in good condition, Clemens' No. 102 ; alar exp., 7.5 

 mm. 



This is the well known species described previously by Fitch 

 under the preoccupied name qucrcifoliella,\ and subsequently 

 by Frey and Boll as quercitorum^ as determined by Lord Wal- 

 singham. Bred specimens, compared with Clemens' type, are in 

 the U. S. National Museum. 



Lithocolletis tubiferella Clemens. 



One type, hind wings and abdomen missing, Clemens' No. 

 101 ; alar exp., 8 mm. 



Specimens of this interesting species, bred by the writer at 

 Washington, D. C., and compared with Clemens' type, are in 

 the U. S. National Museum. 



Tisheria malifoliella Clemens. 



One type, consisting of head and thorax only, Clemens' 

 No. 103. 



The type is of no value, but the species is known bevond 

 doubt from Clemens' description of the moth and from its life 

 history. Bred specimens are in the U. S. National Museum. 



Antispila isabella Clemens. 



One perfect type, Clemens' No. 104 ; alar exp., 7.5 mm. 



Specimens compared with this type are in the U. S. National 

 Museum, bred by the writer at Washington, D. C. 



Aspidisca lucif luella Clemens. 



Two types, one perfect, but not spread, the other without head 

 and without the wings on the left side, Clemens' No. 114; alar 

 exp., 4.5 mm. 



Specimens compared with the types are in the U. S. National 

 Museum. 



The genus is now known as Coptodisca Walsingham.|| 



* Proc. U. S. Nat Mus., xxv, p. 819, 1903. 

 f Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., xxiv, p. 745, 1902. 

 J Rep. Ins., N. Y., v, p. 327, 1859. 

 Stett. ent. Zeit., xxxiv, p. 207, 1873. 

 || Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxi, p. 41, 1895. 



