[ '9 3 



planted. That the reader may be enabled to obferve 

 every particular relating to thefe two proportions, 

 the following table has been conftructed. In this 

 table is exprefled the quantity of feed, and the pro- 

 duce of an Englifh ftatute acre, proportioned to the 

 weight of feed and produce in the different rows of 

 the preceding experiments, together with the re- 

 turns from the feed in each row, and the clear pro- 

 duce after deducting the feed. 



That thofe who choofe it may be able to follow 

 thefe calculations, they need only to be informed, 

 that an acre would contain 24,502 plants at fixteen 

 inches from each other: all the other data neceflary 

 arc exprefled above. 



KMM corre- 

 faMpM to 

 thofe of the 

 fame num- 

 bers in Exp. 

 ad and 3d. 



ad, 



a. 



6th, 

 7th, 



Clear product 

 from an acre. 

 in the propor- 

 tion of each 

 row. after de» 

 ducting the 

 feed. 



Bujb. Dec. 

 153.80 

 115.37 



50.65 



231.00 

 228.7 



irs 



3-7 



From this table it appears, that the 3d and 4th 

 rows, in which the fmalleft quantity of feed was 

 planted, yielded the greateft returns, in proportion to 

 the feed, but the fmalleft in proportion to the extent 

 of ground. The returns of feed being as 25.7 to 

 C 2 one* 



